2020
DOI: 10.1007/s13760-020-01509-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Montreal cognitive assessment for evaluating cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tools applied in the present study included MoCA as well as other tests evaluating executive functions; in fact, the latter tests identified more problems affecting the patients. The scores in MoCA show significant differences in the performance between the clinical group and the controls, and these are suggestive of general cognitive decline in RRMS, which is consistent with results reported by other authors [ 27 , 28 ]. However, the MoCA test identified deficits in the patients at a rate of only 36.4%, while other cognitive problems were found in all the patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The tools applied in the present study included MoCA as well as other tests evaluating executive functions; in fact, the latter tests identified more problems affecting the patients. The scores in MoCA show significant differences in the performance between the clinical group and the controls, and these are suggestive of general cognitive decline in RRMS, which is consistent with results reported by other authors [ 27 , 28 ]. However, the MoCA test identified deficits in the patients at a rate of only 36.4%, while other cognitive problems were found in all the patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The varied results reported in the literature may be associated with the fact that patients with various types of MS were assessed, whereas the differences in the rates of deficits in patients with RRMS may be linked to the fact that different neuropsychological tests were employed [ 26 ]. If MoCA or MMSE are the primary tools applied to assess cognitive functions, there will be few patients with low scores because of the screening nature of these tests, and because they are fairly easy [ 4 , 27 , 28 ]. Due to this, they do not capture subtle cognitive changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The need for a more fine-grained adjustment for age, sex, and education in interpreting an individual’s performance of the MoCA has become even more important as the MoCA is increasingly being used in a variety of patient samples. While originally developed for the detection of MCI and dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease, the MoCA has been studied to assess cognitive deficits in patients with a variety of medical conditions [ 12 ], including HIV [ 13 ], Parkinson’s disease [ 14 ], multiple sclerosis [ 15 ], stroke [ 16 ], frontotemporal dementia [ 17 ], substance-related cognitive disorders [ 18 , 19 ], cardiac arrest [ 20 ], fibromyalgia [ 21 ], Huntington’s disease [ 22 ], syncope and unexpected falls [ 23 ], cerebellar disease [ 24 ], schizophrenia [ 25 ], sickle cell disease [ 26 ], type 2 diabetes [ 27 ], and COVID-19 [ 28 ]. Many of these conditions affect younger adults, who may perform above established cut-off scores based on samples of older individuals even when cognitive impairment is present.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if it demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity, the optimal cutoff is unclear. In patients with other neurological disorders, it was reported that a lower threshold offers a better balance between true-positive and false-positive results [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 32 ]. Consequently, further studies are necessary to investigate the optimal cutoff.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%