2022
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11144059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regression-Based Normative Data for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Its Memory Index Score (MoCA-MIS) for Individuals Aged 18–91

Abstract: (1) Background: There is a need for a brief assessment of cognitive function, both in patient care and scientific research, for which the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a psychometrically reliable and valid tool. However, fine-grained normative data allowing for adjustment for age, education, and/or sex are lacking, especially for its Memory Index Score (MIS). (2) Methods: A total of 820 healthy individuals aged 18–91 (366 men) completed the Dutch MoCA (version 7.1), of whom 182 also completed the cue… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, 26 participants (27%) were classified as cognitively impaired based on their test results. More specifically, the (age-, sex- and education corrected ( Kessels et al, 2022 )) MoCA was impaired (T-score < -1.5 SD) in 5% of patients. On executive functioning tests, 21% of patients scored impaired on TMT-B/A, and 18% on the Digit Span test.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, 26 participants (27%) were classified as cognitively impaired based on their test results. More specifically, the (age-, sex- and education corrected ( Kessels et al, 2022 )) MoCA was impaired (T-score < -1.5 SD) in 5% of patients. On executive functioning tests, 21% of patients scored impaired on TMT-B/A, and 18% on the Digit Span test.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We compared individual neuropsychological test results to available Dutch normative data, resulting in standardized, age-, sex-, and education-adjusted T-scores (M = 50, SD = 10). Also, we converted the MoCA results to T-scores corrected for age and education, based on data from healthy Dutch controls ( de Vent et al, 2016 ; Kessels et al, 2022 ). Consequently, an overall T-score was calculated by averaging the T-scores of all cognitive tests.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings also show that caution is required when administering and interpreting cognitive screens, such as the MoCA or CCAS scale, in individuals with lower intellectual abilities or lower education levels, as such screening instruments have a suboptimal specificity that is attenuated in individuals with lower premorbid cognitive function. For instance, there is abundant evidence that a substantial proportion of cognitively healthy participants are misclassified as having cognitive impairment when using the established cut-off score of the MoCA, as this cut-off score insufficiently adjusts for (lower) educational attainment [ 91 ]. Similarly, a recent study using the CCAS scale for detecting cognitive deficits in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 also demonstrated that some of the healthy controls performed in the impaired range on this scale [ 92 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Healthy controls were recruited through various social networks. Cognitive impairments, episodic memory and executive functions were assessed in all participants using the Dutch version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (Kessels et al, 2022; Nasreddine et al, 2005), the Doors Test (Baddeley et al, 1994) and the Trail Making Test B/A (Bowie & Harvey, 2006; see Table 1 for demographic characteristics of the participants) respectively. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%