2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.histeuroideas.2011.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Montesquieu's anti-Machiavellian Machiavellianism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps. Montesquieu's account of the English separation of powers in 1748 (described above) resembles Machiavelli's sixteenth century analysis of the classical Roman republic, where an adversarial balance of powers loomed large (Rahe, 2011;Sullivan, 2006).…”
Section: Balance Of Strengthsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Perhaps. Montesquieu's account of the English separation of powers in 1748 (described above) resembles Machiavelli's sixteenth century analysis of the classical Roman republic, where an adversarial balance of powers loomed large (Rahe, 2011;Sullivan, 2006).…”
Section: Balance Of Strengthsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Montesquieu rejected Machiavelli's ferocious populism as one-sided, preferring the English system where the citizen's security is protected from all sides (and not only against the nobles). Yet Montesquieu nevertheless appreciates Machiavelli's basic insight: liberty can be protected because, and not in spite of, discord within the polity (Rahe, 2011;Sullivan, 2006).…”
Section: Balance Of Strengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The network's primary goal is the promotion of integrity; combating its opposite (corruption) remains a secondary and derivative, though necessary, element (Sampford, Smith, & Brown, 2005). This attention to structuring external relations to achieve institutional integrity resurrects insights dating all the way back to ideas on the separation of powers, balance of powers, and checks and balances, arising in the work of Machiavelli, Locke, Montesquieu and other early modern political theorists (Breakey, 2014a;Rahe, 2011;Sullivan, 2006;Vile, 1998;Zuckert, 2012).…”
Section: Context-integrity For Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In either case the sub-institution may enjoy different sorts of relations with its larger regime and the other parts of that regime. As part of institutional design, the institution might relate antagonistically to other elements of the same regime, as occurs for example in some incarnations of the separation of powers (Rahe, 2011). Alternatively, the institution may have a supportive or 'associational' relation to other institutions surrounding it in the regime, with each acknowledging the others' role in securing the larger objective (Little, 2000, pp.…”
Section: Nested Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question long has called out for attention and (relative to the rest of Montesquieu scholarship) long met with silence. 1 There are exceptions, of course, but they are few (e.g., Carrese 2005;Levi-Malvano 1912;Rahe 2011;Shackleton 1964;Sullivan 2006). And none has dwelled on the matter in the way that I propose.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%