2007
DOI: 10.3938/jkps.51.65
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo Simulation of X-ray Source Characteristics Using MCPETS and MCNPX Codes for Mammography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we analyzed the photon spectrum emitted by the simulated mammography equipment to verify the reliability of the values calculated by the simulation model. The results show that the shape and distribution of the overall spectrum were in good agreement with those reported in the literature 25–28 . In particular, high similarity was observed in the spectrum shape variation depending on the use of an additional filter.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, we analyzed the photon spectrum emitted by the simulated mammography equipment to verify the reliability of the values calculated by the simulation model. The results show that the shape and distribution of the overall spectrum were in good agreement with those reported in the literature 25–28 . In particular, high similarity was observed in the spectrum shape variation depending on the use of an additional filter.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The results show that the shape and distribution of the overall spectrum were in good agreement with those reported in the literature. [25][26][27][28] In particular, high similarity was observed in the spectrum shape variation depending on the use of an additional filter. Consequently, the reliability of the simulated values obtained in this study was verified through the accuracy of the simulated mammography radiation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Al though there were small numer i cal and mor pho log i cal dif fer ences, these appeared to be due to dif fer ences in the pro gram cal cu la tion meth ods, de tailed geo met ric struc tures, and spec trum mea sure ment po si tions. Fur ther more, when the re sults of this study were com pared with those of pre vi ous stud ies [22][23][24], they showed the same trends in terms of the spec trum shape and peak en ergy. There fore, it is be lieved that the X-rays gen erated in this study were re li able.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%