1992
DOI: 10.1088/0268-1242/7/1/015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo simulation of hole mobilities in an InGaAs/GaAs strained layer quantum well

Abstract: The mobility and velocity-field characteristic of holes in an Ino.,8%,82As/GaAs strained quantum well have been obtained using a Monte Carlo simulation, for lattice temperatures d 77 K and 4.2 K The simulation incorporates a four-band Luttinger-Kohn bandstrutture calculation to acwunt for the effects of heavy-light hole mixing on the subband energy dispersions Md wavefunctions. Intraand inter-subband phonon scattering and intrasubband alloy scattering processes are considered. The simulated 77 K phonon limited… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculated in-plane heavy hole effective mass is given to be around 0.125m 0 in a strained 9-nm In 0.18 Ga 0.82 As QW. 20 Thus we calculate the ground state exciton binding energy in structure S for an in-plane heavy hole mass of suggested 0.07, 12 0.1, and the upper bound of 0.22m 0 , which gives a difference of around 1 meV with respect to the value of 0.1m 0 used in this work ͑see Table I͒. To our knowledge there has been no calculations for InGaAs/GaAs coupled QW's with electric field. For coupled GaAs/AlGaAs QW's we have found two variational calculations of the ground-state exciton binding energy, 17,21 which, however, have not included parameters of structure B.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The calculated in-plane heavy hole effective mass is given to be around 0.125m 0 in a strained 9-nm In 0.18 Ga 0.82 As QW. 20 Thus we calculate the ground state exciton binding energy in structure S for an in-plane heavy hole mass of suggested 0.07, 12 0.1, and the upper bound of 0.22m 0 , which gives a difference of around 1 meV with respect to the value of 0.1m 0 used in this work ͑see Table I͒. To our knowledge there has been no calculations for InGaAs/GaAs coupled QW's with electric field. For coupled GaAs/AlGaAs QW's we have found two variational calculations of the ground-state exciton binding energy, 17,21 which, however, have not included parameters of structure B.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…aj (2) is the quantum well envelope function associated with the bulk Bloch periodic function I j ) , and the sum-Ezfiog and I :, -4) states. All generated band structures feature anticrossing, a consequence of subband mixing that m a r b the exchange in character of states in the two doubly degenerate bands as a result of subband mixing.…”
Section: Previous Simulations Of Ingaas Quantum Weus [4]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…! oy scattering has been described assumin% a random alloy, in which the alloy scattering potential has the same symmetry as the lattice sites and a magnitude of A E = 0.267eV [2]. Scattering rates for all the processes are calculated from Fermi's Golden rule:…”
Section: Previous Simulations Of Ingaas Quantum Weus [4]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent paper [5], we reported o n the development of a Monte Carlo simulation of hole transport in an InGaAs/CaAs strained quantum well, using a k . p bdndstructure calculation to determine the subband energy dispersions and the hole-phonon scattering rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%