2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.matcom.2008.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo methods for computing the capacitance of the unit cube

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2. For N = 3, we find good agreement between simulation and the independently derived estimate for C 3 from [19]. From physical arguments detailed at the end of this letter, we have determined an expansion of the Newtonian capacitance for large N given by…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2. For N = 3, we find good agreement between simulation and the independently derived estimate for C 3 from [19]. From physical arguments detailed at the end of this letter, we have determined an expansion of the Newtonian capacitance for large N given by…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
“…Using the exact simulation algorithm, we obtain the numerical estimate, α 2 ≈ −1.67. Our MFPT calculation thus provides an approximation for the capacitance C N , which otherwise remains challenging to compute [19]. For fixed 0 < < 1, an asymptotic expansion for N 1 is given bȳ…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it should be noted that the surface charge method with extrapolation to an infinite number of subdivisions gives a quite reasonable value for the capacitance of the unit cube. [8] Milovanovic et al describes the calculations of the capacitance per unit length of one or multilayer dielectric lines are presented. Special attention is given to the calculations of the capacitance per unit length of lines with rectangular cross sections, whose electrodes may be in different or the same layers of a two layer dielectric line.…”
Section: General Analysismentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Neither total capacitance nor charge distribution on a conducting cube is not known analytically and only numerical capacitance is known. [ 14,18 ] In this section, we compute charge distribution over a finite region of a unit cube held at unit potential (see Figure and compare with the results of the first‐passage algorithm.…”
Section: Illustrating Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%