2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2013.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo estimation of photoneutrons spectra and dose equivalent around an 18MV medical linear accelerator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
8
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5 showed that the largest equivalent neutron dose was at isocenter 0.15 mSv/Gy reached to 0.02 mSv/Gy at 100cm. this data correlated with the previous published works [17,18,19]. In reference [17] the equivalent neutron dose is greater at the isocenter 1.35 mSv/Gy and decreases gradually with the distance away from the isocenter 0.0469 mSv/Gy at 75 cm, and decreased from 1.288mSv/Gy at the isocenter to 0.062mSv/Gy at 100cm as found in reference [19].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…5 showed that the largest equivalent neutron dose was at isocenter 0.15 mSv/Gy reached to 0.02 mSv/Gy at 100cm. this data correlated with the previous published works [17,18,19]. In reference [17] the equivalent neutron dose is greater at the isocenter 1.35 mSv/Gy and decreases gradually with the distance away from the isocenter 0.0469 mSv/Gy at 75 cm, and decreased from 1.288mSv/Gy at the isocenter to 0.062mSv/Gy at 100cm as found in reference [19].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…From Table 1 , one can note a good agreement achieved between the obtained results and the related values in the literature. [ 19 34 35 36 37 ] It can also see, the average relative difference of our results with literature is 5.4% and 20.1% for the flux and the ambient dose equivalent of neutrons, respectively. These differences are reasonable, because the type of study (measurement/simulation), cross-section libraries for photoneutrons production, as well as the treatment room geometries differed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…The difference in copy number of the FDXR and RAD51 genes under 6 and 18 MV beam energies is related to two components, namely the effect of higher energy (18 MV versus 6 MV) and neutron contamination (photo neutron) at 18 MV. Rapid neutron contamination is caused by X-ray beams over 10 MV ( 25 , 26 ). Figures 3 and 4 show that the DNA damage in cells was increased with increasing dose in low and intermediate doses (0.2, 0.5, and 2 Gy).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%