2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2021.106695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo calculation of organ and effective doses due to photon and neutron point sources and typical X-ray examinations: Results of an international intercomparison exercise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This phantom is based on the previously published computational phantom, developed by our group 25 . Though MC simulations are valuable research methods, their setup and computational time can take a significant amount of time 26,27 . In addition, MC simulations are subject to uncertainties such as underestimation of the absorbed dose outside the primary radiation field 28–32 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This phantom is based on the previously published computational phantom, developed by our group 25 . Though MC simulations are valuable research methods, their setup and computational time can take a significant amount of time 26,27 . In addition, MC simulations are subject to uncertainties such as underestimation of the absorbed dose outside the primary radiation field 28–32 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 25 Though MC simulations are valuable research methods, their setup and computational time can take a significant amount of time. 26 , 27 In addition, MC simulations are subject to uncertainties such as underestimation of the absorbed dose outside the primary radiation field. 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 Therefore, physical in‐phantom measurements are indispensable and allow an experimental measurement of the fetal dose enabling validation of MC simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A summary of the exercises is provided in the last article of the Special Issue (Rabus et al, 2022), which presents the findings and common conclusions from the ten articles reporting the results of each exercise (De Saint-Hubert et al, 2021Eakins et al, 2021;Gómez-Ros et al, 2021Huet et al, 2022;Rabus et al, 2021;Villagrasa et al, 2022;Zankl et al, 2021bZankl et al, , 2021c. One of these issues was the correct assessment of bone marrow dose, which prompted the inclusion of an article in this special issue explaining the ICRP-recommended method for bone marrow dosimetry (Zankl et al, 2021a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%