2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0960-1481(02)00215-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monolithic crystalline multijunction solar cell development and analysis at the US Air Force research laboratory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Normally, high n and high J 0 indicate a poor quality bulk material or junction interface in the p–n diodes. For triple‐junction (3‐J) solar cells, a high n would be presented because the n value (= n top + n mid + n bot ) of a 3‐J solar cell is the sum of ideality factors of the top‐cell ( n top ), middle‐cell ( n mid ), and bottom‐cell ( n bot ) . The typical n value of a 3‐J InGaP/GaAs/Ge solar cell of about 4–5 and the n value of individual junctions of 1.5–2 were reported .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Normally, high n and high J 0 indicate a poor quality bulk material or junction interface in the p–n diodes. For triple‐junction (3‐J) solar cells, a high n would be presented because the n value (= n top + n mid + n bot ) of a 3‐J solar cell is the sum of ideality factors of the top‐cell ( n top ), middle‐cell ( n mid ), and bottom‐cell ( n bot ) . The typical n value of a 3‐J InGaP/GaAs/Ge solar cell of about 4–5 and the n value of individual junctions of 1.5–2 were reported .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For triple‐junction (3‐J) solar cells, a high n would be presented because the n value (= n top + n mid + n bot ) of a 3‐J solar cell is the sum of ideality factors of the top‐cell ( n top ), middle‐cell ( n mid ), and bottom‐cell ( n bot ) . The typical n value of a 3‐J InGaP/GaAs/Ge solar cell of about 4–5 and the n value of individual junctions of 1.5–2 were reported . An average ideality factor value n ave ( n /3) of approximately 1.67 (1.60) for the triple‐junction solar cells with (without) QDs before a passivation coating was obtained and was used to examine the quality of epitaxial film grown by MOCVD, in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An MJ cell consists of several subcells, each subcell posses its own parameters; therefore, the vector parameters in Equation () represent equivalent parameters of the MJ cell . At non‐uniform illumination, a solar cell may operate at negative voltage, and therefore, the aforementioned model is extended to include an additional term describing the diode avalanche breakdown at high negative voltages of the cell.…”
Section: Equation Of Single‐diode Multi‐junction Solar Cell Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model was used also for the investigation of the dependence of MJ cell performance on spectrum . An MJ cell model which includes recombination, tunneling, diffusion mechanisms, and parasitic resistances is described in . These models provide a good quality curve fitting; however, the subcells' parameters are not dealt with.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After increasing the efficiency of triple-junction solar cells from 24% in 1998 to 30% in 2003, [4][5][6] efforts to increase cell performance have shifted to new approaches capable of yielding 33-35% efficiency. Solar cells incorporating lattice mismatch buffers promise to open the trade space for new junction materials.…”
Section: Multijunction Solar Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%