2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2011.10.083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monolithic bed structure for capillary liquid chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
53
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
0
53
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The bed structures of monolithic capillary columns, such as the pore size and distribution, determine the separation efficiency [52]. Undesirable pore size and nonuniform structure may limit the separation performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The bed structures of monolithic capillary columns, such as the pore size and distribution, determine the separation efficiency [52]. Undesirable pore size and nonuniform structure may limit the separation performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monolith-based cLC for protein and peptide analysis Monolithic capillary columns have been widely applied for protein and peptide separation by cLC, with the advantages of relatively facile preparation, fast mass transfer, low backpressure, and high permeability. Polymer monoliths show better performance for protein separation than silica monoliths because of their biocompatibility and large domain size morphology [51,52]. However, the lack of mesopores and the presence of an inhomogeneous structure lead to a low surface area, which is unfavorable for high-efficiency separation, especially for peptides with relatively low molecular weight.…”
Section: Organic-silica Hybrid Monolithsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Use of smaller particles relative to the microchannel size also improves bed structure homogeneity as well as reduce 'wall effects' (Aggarwal et al, 2012), which lead to the fluid preferentially channelling along the walls rather than passing through the bed. However, as pressure drop and, therefore, pumping power tends to increase as the particle size drops (Unger et al, 2008, Dautzenberg and Mukherjee, 2001, DeStefano et al, 2008, a trade-off in the particle-tomicrochannel size must be accepted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spherical particles are commonly used to form µPBs as they tend to ease the formation of more homogeneous bed structures that are known to give the best heat and mass transfer performance (Aggarwal et al, 2012). Use of smaller particles relative to the microchannel size also improves bed structure homogeneity as well as reduce 'wall effects' (Aggarwal et al, 2012), which lead to the fluid preferentially channelling along the walls rather than passing through the bed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%