2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/itsc.2018.8569274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monocular Vehicle Self-localization method based on Compact Semantic Map

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to identify lane lines, a more compact segmentation network is implemented based on the common encoder-decoder architecture, which down-samples the target image 16 times by four convolution layers and decodes with two up-sampling modules; the feature map is up-sample four times within the same process. The entropy loss is applied as the loss function [35]. Because the training samples of segmentation network cover the data of road signs in various lighting, seasonal, and occluded conditions, compared with visual feature points, semantic vector features are more insensitive to seasonal changes and occlusion.…”
Section: Semantic Geometry Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to identify lane lines, a more compact segmentation network is implemented based on the common encoder-decoder architecture, which down-samples the target image 16 times by four convolution layers and decodes with two up-sampling modules; the feature map is up-sample four times within the same process. The entropy loss is applied as the loss function [35]. Because the training samples of segmentation network cover the data of road signs in various lighting, seasonal, and occluded conditions, compared with visual feature points, semantic vector features are more insensitive to seasonal changes and occlusion.…”
Section: Semantic Geometry Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, all the published semantic matching methods are centered around a stereo vision system composed of either a high-cost specialized camera [33], LiDAR [34], or based on the less-favored point cloud map instead of the vector map. In addition, since deep learning inherently consumes lots of computing resources, the extraction of semantic features in these algorithms takes a lot of time, resulting in limited real-time performance [33,35]. In this paper, one consideration of the integration of visual odometry is that the frame rate is higher, which can compensate the time lag from semantic segmentation in the map localization module, and finally output the localization results in real-time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The HD map-based method benefits from the high precision of the map used. For example, the digital map used in [25,26,27] is created from light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data and has a precision of up to 10 cm. A high-accuracy localization technique using urban environment maps for vehicles in motion is proposed in [28], and these maps are generated by integrating GNSS, LiDAR data, and on-board sensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods of the map-matching algorithm based on additional sensors have also been presented. A localization method using a monocular camera and a 3D compact semantic map [ 24 ] and a map-based localization method using the curb extracted by 3D LIDAR [ 25 ] are presented. However, these methods have disadvantages of requiring additional sensors and high computational complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%