2021
DOI: 10.1109/lra.2021.3061343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monocular 3D Detection With Geometric Constraint Embedding and Semi-Supervised Training

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these experiments, we show the contribution of each proposed component to the overall performance of the monocular 3D object detection task. We follow the default setup of Li (2020) to train the baseline model. We use the 40 recall positions Average Precision (AP| R40 ) metric to evaluate the following experimental results for a fair comparison with the official KITTI benchmark.…”
Section: Ablation Study Accumulated Impact Of Our Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In these experiments, we show the contribution of each proposed component to the overall performance of the monocular 3D object detection task. We follow the default setup of Li (2020) to train the baseline model. We use the 40 recall positions Average Precision (AP| R40 ) metric to evaluate the following experimental results for a fair comparison with the official KITTI benchmark.…”
Section: Ablation Study Accumulated Impact Of Our Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system of Eq. ( 17) is the baseline transformation in Li (2020). The over-determined system of linear equations AP = b is solved by using the ordinary least square method.…”
Section: D-3d Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This concise design causes the outstanding work to become the first real-time algorithm for the monocular 3D object detection task. Subsequently, KM3D [18] adopts a differentiable geometric reasoning module to realize the end-to-end training. Admittedly, the success of these methods is inspiring, but they all ignore the possible errors in the intermediate process due to a long detection pipeline, which has a bad effect on the detection performance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the 2D task, these components mainly include a heatmap, 2D size, and 2D center offset, but the 3D task usually contains a keypoints heatmap, keypoints offset, local orientation, 3D dimension and 3D object confidence. Based on the predicted 3D properties, we follow the practice of [18] and adopt a geometric reasoning module (GRM) to solve the 3D position for objects. Furthermore, we design an uncertainty prediction module for characterizing the errors in the detection pipeline to optimize the 3D object position.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 3D detection can be divided into two groups by the type of data: LiDAR and image-based methods (Y. Wang et al, 2018;P. Li et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%