1986
DOI: 10.1021/om00137a013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mono- and dimeric phosphine complexes of cyclopentadienylvanadium(II) halides

Abstract: Reduction of C P V X~(P R~)~ (X = C1, R = Me, Et; X = Br, R = Et) with A1 or Zn in THF gives dimeric vanadium(I1) complexes [CpVX(PR,)],. Methylcyclopentadienyl compounds are accessible by the same method. Treating the dimers with an exceas of PR, gives CpVx(PF&J,, and treating the dimers with bidentate phosphines, CpVCl(DMPE) and CpVCl(DPPE) are obtained. All compounds are paramagnetic with, in principle, three unpaired electrons on the metal atom. ' H NMR spectra of the complexes show large downfield shifts … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[2 H, d, J(CH2HJ = 4.2, CH2C1], 3.92 [1 H, d, J(HCHJ = 10.1, HJ 7 7.45 (1 H, m, Ph), 7.39 (2 H, m, Ph), 7. 33 (2 H, m, Ph), 5.56 (5 H, s, C5H6), 5.43 [1 H, d, J(HC-HJ = 11.4, HJ, 5.29 [1 H, ddd, e/(HaHJ = 11.4, J(HaHJ = 9.8, =/(HaHJ = 6.2, HJ, 4.59 [1 H, d, J(HbHJ = 6.2, HJ, 3.84 [1 H, d, J(HCHJ = 9.8, HJ 8 5.76 (5 H, a, C6H6), 4.53 (2 H, a, HJ, 4.11 (2 H, a, HJ 9 5.66 (5 H, a, C5HJ, 5.01 [1 H, tt, J(HaHJ = 10.3, J(HaHJ = 6.2, HJ, 4.57 [2 H, d, J(HbHJ = 6.2, HJ, 3.52 [2 H, d, =/(HcHJ = 10.3, HJ 106 5.89 (5 H, a, C5HJ, 4.79 [1 H, td, «7(HaHJ = 10.2, J(HaHJ = 6.2, HJ, 4.50 (1 H, m, HJ, 4.41 [1 H, d, =/(HbHJ = 6.2, HJ, 3.99 [2 H, d, J(CH2HJ = 3.6, CHJ, 3.82 [1 H, d, =7(HCHJ = 10.2, HJ 11 5.76 (5 H, a, C5HJ, 4.53 (2 H, a, HJ, 4.11 (2 H, a, HJ 12 5.66 (5 H, a, C5HJ, 4.97 [1 H, tt, =/(HaHJ = 11.0, J(HaHJ = 6.0, HJ, 4.76 [2 H, d, J(HbHJ = 6.0, HJ, 3.21 [2 H, d, </(HcHJ = 11.0, HJ 13 5.47 (2 H, m, CJfJVle), 5.20 (2 H, m, Cg/iJMe), 5.04 [1 H, tt, J(HaHJ = 10.4, =7(HaHJ = 6.1, HJ, 4.37 [2 H, d, J(HbHJ = 6.1, HJ, 3.53 [2 H, d, «7(HCHJ = 10.4, HJ, 2.11 (3 H, a, Me) 14 5.35 (1 H, m, Cgff4Me), 5.32 (1 H, m, C^Me), 5.09 (2 H, m, C^Me), 4.78 [1 H, ddd, =/(HaHJ = 10.1, =Z(HaHJ = 10.0, J(HaHJ = 6.0, HJ, 4.36 [1 H, d, </(HbHJ = 6.0, HJ, 4.32 [1 H, dq, =/(Hc,HJ = 10.1, J(HJMe) = 6.3, HJ, 3.38 [1 H, d, </(HcHa) = 10.0, HJ, 2.06 (3 H, a, C6H4Me), 1.69 [3 H, d, J(MeHJ = 6.3, Me] 15 5.42 (2 H, m, C^Me), 5.19 (2 H, m, CgffJVie), 3.96 (2 H, a, HJ, 3.49 (2 H, a, HJ, 2.28 (3 H, a, MeJ, 2.09 (3 H, a, C6H4Me) 16 5.58 (1 H, m, C^Me), 5.44 (1 H, m, CJfJVIe), 5.25 (1 H, m, CgfiJMe), 5.21 (1 H, m, CjfJMe), 4.96 (1 H, m, HJ, 4.39 [1 H, d, J(HbHJ = 5.8, HJ, 4.21 (1 H, m, HJ, 4.08 [2 H, d, J(CH2HJ = 10.0, CH2C1], 3.46 [1 H, d, J(HCHJ = 10.1, HJ, 2.10 (3 H, a, Me) 17 7.43 (1 H, m, Ph), 7.39 (2 H, m, Ph), 7. 31 (2 H, m, Ph), 5.38 (1 H, m, HJ, 5.36 (1 H, m, Cg/iJMe), 5.33 (1 H, m, CJfJMe), 5.25 [1 H, d, «/(He-HJ = 11.3, HJ, 5.13 (2 H, m, CjH4Me), 4.50 [1 H, d, =/(HbHJ = 6.1, HJ, 3.65 [1 H, d, J(HCHJ = 9.2, HJ, 1.99…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[2 H, d, J(CH2HJ = 4.2, CH2C1], 3.92 [1 H, d, J(HCHJ = 10.1, HJ 7 7.45 (1 H, m, Ph), 7.39 (2 H, m, Ph), 7. 33 (2 H, m, Ph), 5.56 (5 H, s, C5H6), 5.43 [1 H, d, J(HC-HJ = 11.4, HJ, 5.29 [1 H, ddd, e/(HaHJ = 11.4, J(HaHJ = 9.8, =/(HaHJ = 6.2, HJ, 4.59 [1 H, d, J(HbHJ = 6.2, HJ, 3.84 [1 H, d, J(HCHJ = 9.8, HJ 8 5.76 (5 H, a, C6H6), 4.53 (2 H, a, HJ, 4.11 (2 H, a, HJ 9 5.66 (5 H, a, C5HJ, 5.01 [1 H, tt, J(HaHJ = 10.3, J(HaHJ = 6.2, HJ, 4.57 [2 H, d, J(HbHJ = 6.2, HJ, 3.52 [2 H, d, =/(HcHJ = 10.3, HJ 106 5.89 (5 H, a, C5HJ, 4.79 [1 H, td, «7(HaHJ = 10.2, J(HaHJ = 6.2, HJ, 4.50 (1 H, m, HJ, 4.41 [1 H, d, =/(HbHJ = 6.2, HJ, 3.99 [2 H, d, J(CH2HJ = 3.6, CHJ, 3.82 [1 H, d, =7(HCHJ = 10.2, HJ 11 5.76 (5 H, a, C5HJ, 4.53 (2 H, a, HJ, 4.11 (2 H, a, HJ 12 5.66 (5 H, a, C5HJ, 4.97 [1 H, tt, =/(HaHJ = 11.0, J(HaHJ = 6.0, HJ, 4.76 [2 H, d, J(HbHJ = 6.0, HJ, 3.21 [2 H, d, </(HcHJ = 11.0, HJ 13 5.47 (2 H, m, CJfJVle), 5.20 (2 H, m, Cg/iJMe), 5.04 [1 H, tt, J(HaHJ = 10.4, =7(HaHJ = 6.1, HJ, 4.37 [2 H, d, J(HbHJ = 6.1, HJ, 3.53 [2 H, d, «7(HCHJ = 10.4, HJ, 2.11 (3 H, a, Me) 14 5.35 (1 H, m, Cgff4Me), 5.32 (1 H, m, C^Me), 5.09 (2 H, m, C^Me), 4.78 [1 H, ddd, =/(HaHJ = 10.1, =Z(HaHJ = 10.0, J(HaHJ = 6.0, HJ, 4.36 [1 H, d, </(HbHJ = 6.0, HJ, 4.32 [1 H, dq, =/(Hc,HJ = 10.1, J(HJMe) = 6.3, HJ, 3.38 [1 H, d, </(HcHa) = 10.0, HJ, 2.06 (3 H, a, C6H4Me), 1.69 [3 H, d, J(MeHJ = 6.3, Me] 15 5.42 (2 H, m, C^Me), 5.19 (2 H, m, CgffJVie), 3.96 (2 H, a, HJ, 3.49 (2 H, a, HJ, 2.28 (3 H, a, MeJ, 2.09 (3 H, a, C6H4Me) 16 5.58 (1 H, m, C^Me), 5.44 (1 H, m, CJfJVIe), 5.25 (1 H, m, CgfiJMe), 5.21 (1 H, m, CjfJMe), 4.96 (1 H, m, HJ, 4.39 [1 H, d, J(HbHJ = 5.8, HJ, 4.21 (1 H, m, HJ, 4.08 [2 H, d, J(CH2HJ = 10.0, CH2C1], 3.46 [1 H, d, J(HCHJ = 10.1, HJ, 2.10 (3 H, a, Me) 17 7.43 (1 H, m, Ph), 7.39 (2 H, m, Ph), 7. 31 (2 H, m, Ph), 5.38 (1 H, m, HJ, 5.36 (1 H, m, Cg/iJMe), 5.33 (1 H, m, CJfJMe), 5.25 [1 H, d, «/(He-HJ = 11.3, HJ, 5.13 (2 H, m, CjH4Me), 4.50 [1 H, d, =/(HbHJ = 6.1, HJ, 3.65 [1 H, d, J(HCHJ = 9.2, HJ, 1.99…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The organometallic chemistry of ruthenium in the lower (O, +1, and +11) oxidation states is well-established as one of the cornerstones of the coordination chemistry of this metal.1"3 In contrast, comparatively little is known of higher oxidation state organoruthenium chemistry,1"3 apparently despite a quite extensive inorganic chemistry of the +III to +VIII states,1 and also, the implication of high oxidation state organometallics in a range of rutheniumcatalyzed transformations of organic molecules including isomerization and dehydrogenation reactions.4 With particular regard to the ruthenium(IV) oxidation state, organometallic complexes appear to fall into certain 25.20 (25.49) 4 [(i)e-C5H6)Ru(ij3-C3H4Me-l)Cl2] red-orange 92 36.59 (36.99) 4.23 (4.14) 24.35 (24.27) 5 [(I,5-C6H6)Ru(^3-C3H4Me-2)Cl2] orange 92 36.92 (36.99) 4.21 (4.14) 24.35 (24.27) 6 [(7,5-C5H5)Ru(7,3-C3H4CH2C1-1)C12] orange 83 32.98 (33.09) 3. 23 (3.39) 32.27 (32.56) 7 [("6-C5H5)Ru(t3-C3H4Ph-l)Cl2] orange 90 47.66 (47.47) 4.06 (3.98) 20.11 (20.02) 8 [("5-C5H5)Ru("3-C3H4C1-2)C12] orange 86 30.48 (30.73) 2.62 (2.90) 34.42 (34.02) 9 [("5-C6H6)Ru("3-C3H5)Br2] red-orange 90 26.28 (26.18) 2.64 (2.75) 41.43 (43.54) 10 [(7,6-C5H6)Ru(u3-C3H4CH2Br-l)Br2] red-orange 94 23.26 (23.50) 2.38 (2.41) 52.60 (52.11) 11 [("5-C6H5)Ru("3-C3H4Br-2)Br2] red 84 21.69 (21.54) 1.91 (2.03) 54.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…S = 3/2 spin‐state. Similar high‐spin three‐legged piano‐stool vanadium(II) complexes containing traditional diphosphine ligands were reported by Teuben and co‐workers by Zn or Al reduction of trans ‐[CpVCl 2 (PMe 3 ) 2 ] (described above), to generate a dimeric halide‐bridged complex [CpVCl(PMe 3 )] 2 , from which the desired CpV(dmpe)Cl or CpV(dppe)Cl product was formed upon addition of the corresponding diphosphine ligand 21…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydrocarbon and ethereal solvents were distilled from sodium/benzophenone ketyl under a nitrogen atmosphere, while methylene chloride was dried by distillation from P 4 O 10 under nitrogen, and nitromethane was dried for at least several days with molecular sieves prior to distillation under a nitrogen atmosphere. Co(C 5 H 5 )(C 2 H 4 ) 2 , [Ru(C 5 Me 5 )Cl] 4 , and V(C 5 H 5 )(Cl) 2 (PMe 3 ) 2 were prepared according to published procedures, except that in the preparation of V(C 5 H 5 )(Cl) 2 (PMe 3 ) 2 , NaC 5 H 5 was utilized instead of the magnesium reagent, and a 60:40 hexane/THF solvent mixture was used for extraction and crystallization. ESR spectra were obtained on samples having concentrations of ca.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%