2007
DOI: 10.1071/mu06016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring population change in the cryptic and threatened Western Ground Parrot in relation to fire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are consistent with the pattern found in a number of earlier studies, which cited two sites with 2 birds per 10 ha in habitat 28 years post-fire at Croajingalong National Park in Victoria, an area which is contiguous with Nadgee in NSW (Meredith and Isles 1980); six sites 11-13 years post-fire with 2 birds per 10 ha (McFarland 1989), five sites 15-20 years post-fire with 0.8-2.9 birds per 10 ha (Spearritt and Krieger 2007) and 3 sites 20-37 years post-fire with 0.5-1.8 birds per 10 ha (McFarland, unpubl. data) in Queensland; five sites >30 years post-fire with an average of 1.2 birds per 10 ha in Tasmania (Bryant 1991); and a very high frequency of calling from the Western Ground Parrot in habitat not burned for >40 years at Fitzgerald River National Park (Burbidge et al 2007). Also consistent with a pattern in some earlier studies, was that at some of our sites the highest Ground Parrot densities occurred at intermediate post-fire ages.…”
Section: The Ground Parrot In Long-unburnt Habitatsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…These results are consistent with the pattern found in a number of earlier studies, which cited two sites with 2 birds per 10 ha in habitat 28 years post-fire at Croajingalong National Park in Victoria, an area which is contiguous with Nadgee in NSW (Meredith and Isles 1980); six sites 11-13 years post-fire with 2 birds per 10 ha (McFarland 1989), five sites 15-20 years post-fire with 0.8-2.9 birds per 10 ha (Spearritt and Krieger 2007) and 3 sites 20-37 years post-fire with 0.5-1.8 birds per 10 ha (McFarland, unpubl. data) in Queensland; five sites >30 years post-fire with an average of 1.2 birds per 10 ha in Tasmania (Bryant 1991); and a very high frequency of calling from the Western Ground Parrot in habitat not burned for >40 years at Fitzgerald River National Park (Burbidge et al 2007). Also consistent with a pattern in some earlier studies, was that at some of our sites the highest Ground Parrot densities occurred at intermediate post-fire ages.…”
Section: The Ground Parrot In Long-unburnt Habitatsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The relationship between the post‐fire age of vegetation and its occupancy by ground parrots is an ‘unknown’ in Western Australia due to a lack of long‐term studies specifically addressing this question (Burbidge et al ., 1997). The current study indicates that ground parrots prefer a mosaic of vegetation ages, consistent with the conclusions of Burbidge et al . (in press).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this species has also been recorded in more recently burnt vegetation (< 6 years), albeit mostly adjacent to long unburnt habitat (Burbidge et al ., 1997). The role of fire in maintaining suitable habitat for the ground parrot is complex (Burbidge et al ., in press), but large‐scale wildfires are likely to be detrimental to a species that is believed to be relatively sedentary and usually only flies for short distances (Meredith et al ., 1984; McFarland, 1991a,b; Burbidge, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of our findings we can hypothesize that climate change may be a significant causal factor in the decline of the western ground parrot but is not the primary cause of decline. It is likely that climate change, when compounded with known impacts such as inappropriate fire regimes, habitat loss and predation by cats and foxes (Burbidge et al, 2007), may have contributed to the loss of populations and may continue to do so unless these impacts are mitigated. To undertake a future test of this hypothesis and to minimize the risk to western ground parrots, we recommend the use of surrogate species to test the effectiveness of our management actions before reintroducing this species to selected sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%