2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.05.112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring pesticide residues in greenhouse tomato by combining acetonitrile-based extraction with dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction followed by gas-chromatography–mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(29 reference statements)
1
29
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the comparison of studies with different sampling may be inaccurate, comparing the results obtained in this study with those found in tomato samples in other countries, we observed that pesticide residues in positive samples of tomatoes marketed in Brazil show higher values than in Portugal where 24 of the 30 pesticides under study were not detected in any of the 20 sample analyzed (Melo et al, 2012). In a study conducted in Turkey, pesticide residues were below the LOD in tomato samples (Sungur & Tunur, 2012), and in Spain, QuEChERS method has been applied to 59 real samples in different kinds of fruits and vegetables, including tomato.…”
Section: Application Of Real Samplessupporting
confidence: 50%
“…Although the comparison of studies with different sampling may be inaccurate, comparing the results obtained in this study with those found in tomato samples in other countries, we observed that pesticide residues in positive samples of tomatoes marketed in Brazil show higher values than in Portugal where 24 of the 30 pesticides under study were not detected in any of the 20 sample analyzed (Melo et al, 2012). In a study conducted in Turkey, pesticide residues were below the LOD in tomato samples (Sungur & Tunur, 2012), and in Spain, QuEChERS method has been applied to 59 real samples in different kinds of fruits and vegetables, including tomato.…”
Section: Application Of Real Samplessupporting
confidence: 50%
“…Los porcentajes de recuperación superiores al 100 % y las diferencias obtenidas en distintas investigaciones, podrían entre otras cosas ser atribuibles al denominado efecto matriz (35). La mayoría de trabajos en tomate ha considerado que dicho efecto está relacionado con el porcentaje de recuperación de los residuos analizados (33,44). En este trabajo, δ-BHC y clorpirifos presentaron porcentajes de recuperación y desviación muy elevados, 188% ± 13 y 210% ± 39, respectivamente.…”
Section: Implementación Del Métodounclassified
“…Aparentemente, todas las muestras poseen concentraciones de residuos de plaguicidas entre los límites permitidos según la CA (14,44). Pero, según la CE el grupo endosulfán (endosulfán I, endosulfán II, endosulfán sulfato) y el metoxicloro superaron los límites máximos residuales establecidos en el 14,7% y el 100% de las muestras, respectivamente.…”
Section: Muestreounclassified
“…The determination of OPs in fruits, vegetables and water using GC with either electron capture (ECD) (Kin and Huat, 2009), flame photometric (FPD) (Yu et al, 2004;Pappas and Kyriakidis, 2003;Liu et al, 2013;Ahmadi et al, 2006;Khalili-Zanjani et al, 2008;Berijani et al, 2006), nitrogen phosphorus (NPD) (Wang et al, 2008) or mass spectrometry (MS) (Nguyen et al, 2008;Melo et al, 2012) detectors has been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%