2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2015.04.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring of welding status by molten pool morphology during high-power disk laser welding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, emissions in the VIS can be used to determine keyhole length in deep penetration welding which allows the adjustment of the laser power in-situ in order to realize a defined penetration depth [2]. By adaption of the illumination, the morphology of parts of the process zone can be measured and correlated to process stability [59].…”
Section: Process Understanding 231 Process Observationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, emissions in the VIS can be used to determine keyhole length in deep penetration welding which allows the adjustment of the laser power in-situ in order to realize a defined penetration depth [2]. By adaption of the illumination, the morphology of parts of the process zone can be measured and correlated to process stability [59].…”
Section: Process Understanding 231 Process Observationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low relative density can be attributed to the insufficient melting for 40 W power and more than 1000 mm/s scanning speed. We can find the width of tracks will narrow down when speed increase, which also leads to a shallow molten pool [ 33 ]. As a result, the shallow molten pool remelts of fewer previously printed layers to leave plenty of powders and cracks in the cubes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, surface defects detection methods mainly include traditional image processing methods and deep learning methods [1][2][3]. Traditional image processing methods detect targets through edge detection, threshold segmentation, feature histogram, classical machine learning methods [2,[4][5][6][7][8][9][10] (support vector machine, k-Nearest Neighbor method and Naive Bayes, neural network, decision tree, etc.). Literature [11] constructed neural network to detect welding defects under alternating/rotating magnetic field, and the test detection accuracy is 94.1%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%