2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2007.06.168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring of Antihypertensive Treatment for Left Ventricular Mass Regression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…53 Moreover, the predictive power of PP amplification was superior to carotid PP. In untreated subjects with essential hypertension, 54 regression of left ventricular mass index after 1 year of drug treatment was independently associated with the increase of PP amplification, but not with the reduction in brachial PP. Further evidence is still awaited.…”
Section: Clinical Implications Of Pulse Pressure Amplificationmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…53 Moreover, the predictive power of PP amplification was superior to carotid PP. In untreated subjects with essential hypertension, 54 regression of left ventricular mass index after 1 year of drug treatment was independently associated with the increase of PP amplification, but not with the reduction in brachial PP. Further evidence is still awaited.…”
Section: Clinical Implications Of Pulse Pressure Amplificationmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…28 In a clinical setting, these parameters have been reported to be superior to traditional brachial artery blood pressure measurements in predicting future cardiovascular events, and in evaluating the response to drug treatment. [2][3][4][5]29 During pregnancy, the maternal circulation undergoes remarkable physiological adaptations. Normal pregnancy is associated with increased cardiac output, intravascular volume and a marked decrease in vascular resistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the regression of left ventricular hypertrophy during antihypertensive treatment is considered proportional to the reductions in the aortic augmentation index and reflection magnitude (de Luca et al 2004;Hashimoto et al 2007bHashimoto et al , 2008c. Another study showed that the casual (office) central pressure indices can better predict the regression than the home brachial pressure (Hashimoto et al 2007a). These data suggest that left ventricular hypertrophy is a compensating reaction to the central pressure overload as exacerbated by the peripheral wave reflection, and it is (at least partially) reversible by normalizing the central hemodynamics.…”
Section: Central Hemodynamics and Heartmentioning
confidence: 99%