Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale Conference 2014
DOI: 10.1145/2556325.2566246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring MOOCs

Abstract: For an instructor who is teaching a massive open online course (MOOC), what is the best way to understand their class? What is the best way to view how the students are interacting with the content while the course is running? To help prepare for the next iteration, how should the course's data be best analyzed after the fact? How do these instructional monitoring needs differ between online courses with tens of thousands of students and courses with only tens? This paper reports the results of a survey of 92 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Khalil and Ebner (2013) found the role of interaction in the learning process of MOOCs and how the perceptions of interaction affected MOOC learning behavior and learning effect in students. Stephens-Martinez et al (2014) pointed out that a MOOC instructor's views about different sources of information might affect the behavior and performance level of students in the learning process of MOOCs. Moreover, Watson et al (2016) showed that the MOOC instructors could influence the MOOC learning results and attitudes of students by using social presence, teaching presence, and dissonance factors.…”
Section: Dropout In Moocsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Khalil and Ebner (2013) found the role of interaction in the learning process of MOOCs and how the perceptions of interaction affected MOOC learning behavior and learning effect in students. Stephens-Martinez et al (2014) pointed out that a MOOC instructor's views about different sources of information might affect the behavior and performance level of students in the learning process of MOOCs. Moreover, Watson et al (2016) showed that the MOOC instructors could influence the MOOC learning results and attitudes of students by using social presence, teaching presence, and dissonance factors.…”
Section: Dropout In Moocsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since interaction is a key component in the quality of online learning [1], Learning Management Systems and MOOCs frequently adopt asynchronous online discussion forums to foster interaction [2][3][4]. Forums enable instructors to understand and intervene in learning activities [5,6], and students have time to think and formulate answers. Individuals collaboratively build knowledge while collaborating in an asynchronous online environment [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development process allowed us to explore alternative ways to implement a dashboard that other FutureLearn partner institutions may find useful, with a number of different visualizations explored, as well as consideration of related literature (Stephens-Martinez et al, 2014). Furthermore, a direct comparison with a similar effort by (Leon Urrutia et al, 2016) demonstrates the viability and effectiveness of the implementation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research (Clayphan et al, 2015;Kia, Pardos, & Hatala, 2016;Stephens-Martinez, Hearst, & Fox, 2014) identified five key areas which appear to direct the attention of educators and developers in MOOCs: 1) An overview of the course, 2) Who are the participants/learners, 3) How participants interact/engage with the material, 4) How participants interact in the forums, and 5) How participants perform in the course.…”
Section: Exploring Different Types Of Visualizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%