2020
DOI: 10.3390/ijgi9100580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring Forest Change in the Amazon Using Multi-Temporal Remote Sensing Data and Machine Learning Classification on Google Earth Engine

Abstract: Deforestation causes diverse and profound consequences for the environment and species. Direct or indirect effects can be related to climate change, biodiversity loss, soil erosion, floods, landslides, etc. As such a significant process, timely and continuous monitoring of forest dynamics is important, to constantly follow existing policies and develop new mitigation measures. The present work had the aim of mapping and monitoring the forest change from 2000 to 2019 and of simulating the future forest developm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(72 reference statements)
2
29
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, we tested either a composition with these three best indices and a composition with all indices, highlighting that, for classification purposes, a correct choice of VIs is needed and should be preferred to the mere addition of derived indices. Concerning the classification process, the choice of the three adopted classifiers was in line with the findings of the review of Taminia et al [14], who reported RF, CART, and SVM as those which have been most adopted in previous GEE works (97,26, and 21 published papers, respectively). Concerning the accuracy results, RF proved to be the best solution, in agreement with Rodriguez-Galiano et al [123], who defined RF as being superior to other classifiers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, we tested either a composition with these three best indices and a composition with all indices, highlighting that, for classification purposes, a correct choice of VIs is needed and should be preferred to the mere addition of derived indices. Concerning the classification process, the choice of the three adopted classifiers was in line with the findings of the review of Taminia et al [14], who reported RF, CART, and SVM as those which have been most adopted in previous GEE works (97,26, and 21 published papers, respectively). Concerning the accuracy results, RF proved to be the best solution, in agreement with Rodriguez-Galiano et al [123], who defined RF as being superior to other classifiers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The GEE environment integrates several different classifiers. We compared the performance of three of them, chosen according to their wide use and reliability in LC classification [11,14,86,[97][98][99][100][101]: random forest (RF), classification and regression tree (CART), and support vector machine (SVM).…”
Section: Machine Learning Classification Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adding a temporal dimension, the fusion of multi-temporal acquisitions of RS data provide opportunities to detect changes in, for example, forest cover over time [34]. However, in the nemoral forest zone, multi-temporal data may further detect seasonal variation in spectral signature and radiometric backscatter specific to e.g., individual tree species or forest types.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies can be potentially crucial for improvements of emissions estimates -such as [37]. A number of studies were identified which present platforms that can promote and improve public access to information, and these platforms have also proved to be crucial for forest monitoring efforts [38,39]. Near-real-time (NRT) forest monitoring studies were less represented in the results of the literature search, and some countries did not have a single study in this category.…”
Section: Distribution Categories and The Country Of The Affiliation Of The First Authors Of Recent Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%