2016 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/ivs.2016.7535420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring driver cognitive load using functional near infrared spectroscopy in partially autonomous cars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the previous fNIRS related workload studies in the transportation domain (Kojima et al, 2005; Tomioka et al, 2009; Ayaz et al, 2012; Gateau et al, 2015; Foy et al, 2016; Sibi et al, 2016) focused only on frontal brain activations, primarily due to the ease in preparing the optodes around the forehead. On comparing the multivariate predictions from the whole head measurements with only the 12 frontal channels around the forehead, the mean Pearson correlation dropped by 37.7%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the previous fNIRS related workload studies in the transportation domain (Kojima et al, 2005; Tomioka et al, 2009; Ayaz et al, 2012; Gateau et al, 2015; Foy et al, 2016; Sibi et al, 2016) focused only on frontal brain activations, primarily due to the ease in preparing the optodes around the forehead. On comparing the multivariate predictions from the whole head measurements with only the 12 frontal channels around the forehead, the mean Pearson correlation dropped by 37.7%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the recent trend towards semi‐autonomous vehicles, a particular challenge is to determine opportune times to adjust the level of automation due to user preference, critical events, or failures of automation. In a pilot study, we observed that autonomous driving conditions reduced fNIRS workload conditions relative to manual driving while a variety of secondary tasks imposed additional demands even in the autonomous state (Sibi, Ayaz, Kuhns, Sirkin, & Ju, ), similarly to reductions observed in cruise control (Tsunashima & Yanagisawa, ). Assessment of cognitive workload may help autonomous vehicles detect distraction and identify safe ways to restore manual control.…”
Section: Towards Real‐time Monitoring Of Individuals and Interactionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The transition from manual to automated driving and vice versa is prone to fail in the stateof-the-art. Recent research showed that drivers exhibit low cognitive load when monitoring automated driving compared to doing a secondary task [284]. Even though some experimental systems can recognize driver-activity with a driver facing camera based on head and eye-tracking [285], and prepare the driver for handover with visual and auditory cues [286] in simulation environments, a real world system with an efficient handover interaction module does not exist at the moment.…”
Section: Human Machine Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%