2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.proenv.2013.06.088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring and Modelling Evapotranspiration in Flooded and Aerobic Rice Fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rice seeding under flooding, while requiring a large amount of water availability (15,000-20,000 m 3 /ha [24]), allows for a better soil drainage, since aquifers rise during flooding. On the contrary, dry seeding requires instead less water and leads to lower evapotranspiration losses [25], but the water loss by percolation is higher, Figure 1. Total number of nests of the two most abundant breeding waterbirds, the grey heron and the little egret, in northwestern Italy during the time window analyzed in this study, compared to their predominant foraging habitat [22,23].…”
Section: The Importance Of Monitoring Standing Water Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rice seeding under flooding, while requiring a large amount of water availability (15,000-20,000 m 3 /ha [24]), allows for a better soil drainage, since aquifers rise during flooding. On the contrary, dry seeding requires instead less water and leads to lower evapotranspiration losses [25], but the water loss by percolation is higher, Figure 1. Total number of nests of the two most abundant breeding waterbirds, the grey heron and the little egret, in northwestern Italy during the time window analyzed in this study, compared to their predominant foraging habitat [22,23].…”
Section: The Importance Of Monitoring Standing Water Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rice seeding under flooding, while requiring a large amount of water availability (15,000-20,000 m 3 /ha [24]), allows for a better soil drainage, since aquifers rise during flooding. On the contrary, dry seeding requires instead less water and leads to lower evapotranspiration losses [25], but the water loss by percolation is higher, especially during the first flooding events (beginning of summer), when water availability is generally lower [16,17]. Moreover, a delayed maximum water requirement (at the beginning of June instead of at the end of April) can cause competition with other crops, with consequent problems for water management at the district scale [26].…”
Section: The Importance Of Monitoring Standing Water Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These (Facchi et al 2013a). For both periods longwave radiation from IRR is slightly higher than for FLD.…”
Section: Solar Radiationmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…, Gharsallah et al (2013) and Facchi et al (2013a). As explained in Hossen et al (2012) the lack of a complete energy balance closure has been reported for most of the eddy covariance studies (Wilson et al 2002), and some of them identified that the measurement errors could be related to soil heat flux as well as horizontal energy advection, energy used in photosynthesis, and heat storage in the canopy and top soil (Mayer and Hollinger 2004;Tsai et al 2007;Foken 2008b).…”
Section: Energy Balance Closurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last years, many works have addressed the study of λE in rice areas (Chemin & Honda, 2006;Chávez et al, 2008;Facchi et al, 2013). The measurement or estimation of λE in flooded ecosystems such as rice paddies present many challenges: intra-annual variations in surface cover, the possible effect of air advection and the quantification of water evaporation beneath the canopy among others (Drexler et al, 2004;Yan et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%