2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2011.00382.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Money, Output, and Inflation in the Longer Term: Major Industrial Countries, 1880–2001

Abstract: Abstract:We study how fluctuations in money growth correlate with fluctuations in real output growth and inflation. Using band-pass filters, we extract cycles from each time series that last 2 to 8 (business cycles) and 8 to 40 (longer-term cycles) years. We employ annual data, 1880-2001 without gaps, for eleven industrial countries. Fluctuations in money growth do not play a systematic role at business cycle frequencies. However, money growth leads or affects contemporaneously inflation, but not real output g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(96 reference statements)
4
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We find evidence of causality running from a positive M 2 money supply shock to a positive inflation shock, and a negative M 2 money supply shock to a negative inflation shock for all three countries, consistent with the results of the NARDL estimation. The results, therefore, suggest that M 2 growth holds important informational content for the rate of inflation, consistent with the findings of Haug and Dewald (). Examining causality from the rate of inflation to M 2 growth, we find for the U.S, that a negative inflation rate shock leads to a positive M 2 shock, and for the U.K, a negative inflation shock leads to a negative M 2 shock.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We find evidence of causality running from a positive M 2 money supply shock to a positive inflation shock, and a negative M 2 money supply shock to a negative inflation shock for all three countries, consistent with the results of the NARDL estimation. The results, therefore, suggest that M 2 growth holds important informational content for the rate of inflation, consistent with the findings of Haug and Dewald (). Examining causality from the rate of inflation to M 2 growth, we find for the U.S, that a negative inflation rate shock leads to a positive M 2 shock, and for the U.K, a negative inflation shock leads to a negative M 2 shock.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In a study of inflation in Guinea over 1992–2003, Blavy () notes the existence of a long‐run relationship between money supply and inflation using cointegration and error‐correction methodology. Employing a long time series covering 1880–2001 for 11 developed nations, Haug and Dewald (), similarly find that changes in money growth do not consistently explain business cycle movements, however, that over the longer run, money growth affects inflation, but not real output growth. Despite policy changes, they do not find any evidence of structural breaks between money growth and inflation.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This also raises the question of which policy tools are there nowadays that will actually assist the Bank of England in prudently managing the domestic economy. The finding of no long-run effect of interest rate on growth seems consistent with Haug and Dewald (2011) who report money growth is unrelated to output growth at longer horizons.…”
Section: Nominal Short Rate Shocksupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The results show signi…cant evidence of money supply, the CPI, and in ‡ation expectations Granger predicting real oil prices. Also money supply growth Granger predicts in ‡ation, as has been found before (Haug and Dewald, 2012). And money growth and in ‡ation predict international gold prices, the oil to gold price ratio, and the US dollar exchange rate index.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%