Money laundering in the United Arab Emirates: the risks and the reality

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine the possibility of laundering money through the United Arab Emirates (UAE), the perceived risk and the stark reality. That money laundering prevention mechanisms are being circumvented is evident by reference to the international assessments by the Financial Action Task Force and information from key informants. To develop effective improvements, the modus operandi of money laundering needs to be re-examined. Design/methodology/approach The empirical findings are based on over 60 semi-standardized interviews with alleged criminal and expert compliance officers operating in an international arena. These findings were subject to a qualitative content analysis, while a further quantitative survey of around 200 compliance officers expanded on the techniques of money laundering. This served to explore whether there was a discrepancy between the presentation of money laundering in the literature in contrast to reality. Findings Owing to the transnational nature of money laundering, the global financial market is dependent on the uniformity of anti-money laundering (AML) regulations. Despite immense progress, there are still several key weaknesses in the financial system of the UAE, such as the existence of Free Zones and the divergence of AML awareness. Research limitations/implications The scope of the interviews is limited to the personal experience of the informants. This is mediated by seeking uniformity in answers as well as literature support. Originality/value This paper, supported by empirical evidence, discerns why the current regulatory measures are minimally effective. There is an unmistakable need for the international coordination of financial regulatory bodies. The literature describes the occurrence of money laundering, but no studies have engaged to examine the pragmatic mechanism in place which allow money laundering to persevere despite the significant improvements of AML policies.

Global Anti-Money Laundering and Combating Terrorism Financing Regulatory Framework: A Critique

“…Post 2007/8 GFC, much emphasis has been placed on effecting regulatory sanctions for non-compliance with the overall aim of safeguarding the financial system and improving transparency (Zetzsche et al 2019;Butler and Brooks 2018). AML/CFT weaknesses affect the financial system's integrity and national security (Teichmann and Wittmann 2022;Cutter 2017). Regulators utilise formal and informal enforcement to deter corrupt behaviour.…”

“…Failure to implement results in the country being used as a conduit for money laundering and terrorism funding, which goes against the global shared objective. AML/CFT weaknesses affect the financial system's integrity and national security (Teichmann and Wittmann 2022;Cutter 2017).…”

Anti-money laundering and customer due diligence: empirical evidence from South Africa

“…After the 2007/2008 GFC, much emphasis has been placed on effecting regulatory sanctions for non-compliance with the overall aim of safeguarding the financial system and improving transparency (Zetzsche et al, 2019;Butler and Brooks, 2018). AML/CFT weaknesses affect the financial system's integrity and national security (Teichmann and Wittmann, 2022;Cutter, 2018). Schoonenboom and Johnson (2017) defined the population as the subjects of interest in a study.…”

Practical considerations regarding the implementation of economic sanctions by Swiss financial service providers

“…To implement the restrictive measures of financial sanctions, providers must have, or else rapidly develop, the practical mechanisms which dictate these restrictions. The efficacy of economic sanctions is after all dependent on the reality of sanction implementation and circumvention (Teichmann and Wittmann, 2022c). This paper attempts to highlight the strong correlation between a country’s anti-money laundering (AML) framework and its ease in implementing sanctions.…”