2002
DOI: 10.1108/13590790310808574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Money laundering and terrorist financing: the role of capital market regulators

Abstract: Outlines the special recommendations of the October 2001 meeting on terrorist financing, which complement the 40 Recommendations of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), and the resulting FATF plan of action; they included ratification and implementation of UN instruments, criminalising the financing of terrorism and associated money laundering, freezing and confiscating terrorist assets, reporting suspicious transactions related to terrorism, international cooperation, alternative remittance systems, wire t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this study emphasize that the current pressure on the financial sector to implement strict anti-money laundering compliance mechanisms will not lead to the desired results as long as it is feasible to launder money in other economic sectors or in countries with lax regulations. Hence, this study supports the introduction of an international financial intelligence unit and intensification of information exchange between enforcement entities (Thony, 1996, p. 279 f.; Jayasuriya, 2003, p. 31 f.). It is argued that the burden of fighting money laundering cannot only be placed on the financial sector, but also needs to be addressed by legislators.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The results of this study emphasize that the current pressure on the financial sector to implement strict anti-money laundering compliance mechanisms will not lead to the desired results as long as it is feasible to launder money in other economic sectors or in countries with lax regulations. Hence, this study supports the introduction of an international financial intelligence unit and intensification of information exchange between enforcement entities (Thony, 1996, p. 279 f.; Jayasuriya, 2003, p. 31 f.). It is argued that the burden of fighting money laundering cannot only be placed on the financial sector, but also needs to be addressed by legislators.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…To unify individual national efforts, the establishment of an international financial intelligence unit seems reasonable (Thony, 1996, p. 279). Moreover, international cooperation in terms of extraditions and the exchange of information could be intensified (Jayasuriya, 2003, p. 31). Yet, the risk that authorities will abuse anti-money laundering laws to generate profits persists (Gordon, 1995, p. 745).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the international AML treaties, there are several global principles, recommendations and guidelines that have been developed to tackle money laundering in the banking and financial sectors. These include the Basel Principles on Banking Supervision (developed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision[23]), the Wolfsberg Global Anti-Money Laundering Guidelines for Private Banking (formulated by the Wolfsberg Group[24]), and the Forty Recommendations against Money Laundering and Nine Special Recommendations against Financing of Terrorism [adopted by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF[25])] (Johnson and Lim, 2003;Jayasuriya, 2003;Pieth and Aiolfi, 2003;Gill and Taylor, 2004;Haynes, 2004;De Koker, 2009b;Tsingou, 2010;Williams, 2014).…”
Section: Money Laundering Control and Banks: An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%