2007
DOI: 10.1162/jeea.2007.5.2-3.524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Money in Monetary Policy Design: A Formal Characterization of Ecb-Style Cross-Checking

Abstract: The European Central Bank (ECB) has assigned a special role to money in its two‐pillar strategy and has received much criticism for this decision. The case against including money in the central bank's interest rate rule is based on a standard model of the monetary transmission process that underlies many contributions to research on monetary policy in the last two decades. In this paper, we develop a justification for including money in the interest rate rule by allowing for imperfect knowledge regarding unob… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cross-check is triggered in a nonlinear-fashion whenever a statistical test on the basis of the monetary model signals a trend shift. An earlier note, Beck and Wieland (2007), presented an interest rate rule that incorporates such a shift 5 and simulated a counterfactual example in the traditional Keynesian-style model with backward-looking dynamics of Svensson (1997), Orphanides and Wieland (2000) and Orphanides (2003). The present paper shows how to derive an interest rate rule with cross-checking from an optimization problem and proceeds to implement cross-checking in the benchmark New-Keynesian model.…”
Section: Ecb Working Paper Series No 967mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The cross-check is triggered in a nonlinear-fashion whenever a statistical test on the basis of the monetary model signals a trend shift. An earlier note, Beck and Wieland (2007), presented an interest rate rule that incorporates such a shift 5 and simulated a counterfactual example in the traditional Keynesian-style model with backward-looking dynamics of Svensson (1997), Orphanides and Wieland (2000) and Orphanides (2003). The present paper shows how to derive an interest rate rule with cross-checking from an optimization problem and proceeds to implement cross-checking in the benchmark New-Keynesian model.…”
Section: Ecb Working Paper Series No 967mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…A number of NK models, summarised by the term information channel literature, (see Beck & Wieland, 2007Coenen et al, 2005) arguing via money's informational content regarding (potential) output or the natural rate of interest, while other models focus on the information money provides for asset price developments.…”
Section: The Information Channel Of Moneymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 The main reasons for the welfare gain are that money growth contains information on current output growth and that data on the euro area money stock are subject to only negligible measurement errors. 33 Beck & Wieland (2007, too, allow for 32 In their approach, performance of different interest rate rules is measured by a commonly used central bank loss function which aims at minimising the variances of inflation around its target, of the output gap and interest rate changes, respectively (e.g. Rudebusch & Svensson, 1999;Ehrmann & Smets, 2003;Coenen et al, 2005).…”
Section: Money As An Indicator To Improve Perceptions Of Output and Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This particular series of output gap misperceptions measured in percentage point terms was also previously used in Beck and Wieland (2007a) in the context of a model with 7 Specifically, with velocity defined as v t ≡ −m t + p t + y t and money demand determined by equation (5) the long-run trend in velocity corresponds to Δv = (1 − γ y )Δy. Changes in the trend in velocity may arise from changes in potential output growth y, changes in the income elasticity of money demand, γ y , and possibly from other sources such as financial innovations (see Orphanides and Porter (2001) and Masuch et al (2001) (2004)).…”
Section: The Long-run Link Between Money and Inflation And The Conseqmentioning
confidence: 99%