2012
DOI: 10.4324/9780203102237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Money and its Origins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Money is not a universally given medium, nor a social relationship principle [5,118]. The concept of money is fully human made and an issue controlled within the science of law.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Money is not a universally given medium, nor a social relationship principle [5,118]. The concept of money is fully human made and an issue controlled within the science of law.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If compliant with certain characteristics (Einzig, 1966), real money solves the problem of double coincidence of wants as a medium of exchange, facilitates savings as a store of value, enables debt as a unit of deferred payments, and reduces the number of commodity prices from ! to − 1 as a unit of account ( Karimzadi, 2013;Schumpeter, 2014;Smithin, 2014).…”
Section: Real and Nominal Pricesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the hurdles inherent in using real money (Karimzadi, 2013), societies further facilitate exchange by adopting nominal money as a representation of real money (Poor, 1969…”
Section: Real and Nominal Pricesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The government's power to create money, in turn, implied a choice to save some economic actors and not others, as the quick turnaround in finance contrasted almost immediately with stagnation and austerity elsewhere. Meanwhile, the obvious power of abstract constructions of insurance and debt over the real, as opposed to financial, economy inspired a renewed scholarly focus on capitalism and money, and the role the history of money and its myths play in our understanding of the world (Graeber ; Wennerlind ; Amato and Fantacci ; Brown ; Zakim and Kornblith ; Granville ; Karimzadi ; Peacock ; Piketty ; Sklansky ; Stern and Wennerlind ; Spang ; Streeck ; Dodd ).…”
Section: Two Views Of Money and Its Originsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before we return to that, however, it is useful to think about where Desan's analysis leaves us in terms of our original dichotomy between the orthodox and governance views of the origin of money. Desan is not the first author to claim that the orthodox conjectural history of money has no historical basis (Innes 1913; Polanyi, Arensberg, and Pearson 1957; Wray 1998; Smithin 2002; Graeber 2011; Karimzadi 2013; Peacock 2013). However, what Desan has given us, and earlier authors have not, is a thorough alternative, grounded in legal history, that, helpfully, includes an origin story for the orthodox account of money's origins.…”
Section: The Making Money Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%