2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2010.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monetary shocks, exchange rates and trade balances: Evidence from inflation targeting countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Various models estimated used certain assumptions, such as the co-integration relationship among variables, and through imposing other structural restrictions. Ivrendi and Guloglu (2010) argue that most of the conflicting empirical results in the empirical literature are due to the consequences of restrictions imposed on the models stated above. Ivrendi and Guloglu (2010) investigated the relationships between monetary policy shocks, the exchange rate and the trade balance in five inflation-targeting countries using SVECM, with both long-run and short-run restrictions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1 Various models estimated used certain assumptions, such as the co-integration relationship among variables, and through imposing other structural restrictions. Ivrendi and Guloglu (2010) argue that most of the conflicting empirical results in the empirical literature are due to the consequences of restrictions imposed on the models stated above. Ivrendi and Guloglu (2010) investigated the relationships between monetary policy shocks, the exchange rate and the trade balance in five inflation-targeting countries using SVECM, with both long-run and short-run restrictions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Ivrendi and Guloglu (2010) argue that most of the conflicting empirical results in the empirical literature are due to the consequences of restrictions imposed on the models stated above. Ivrendi and Guloglu (2010) investigated the relationships between monetary policy shocks, the exchange rate and the trade balance in five inflation-targeting countries using SVECM, with both long-run and short-run restrictions. 2 They found that a contractionary monetary policy shock leads to an improvement in the trade balance, contradicting the findings of trade puzzles reported in many empirical studies.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While Leduc et al (2007) focus on the sources of high inflation in the 1970s, Mehra and Herrington (2008) deal with the sources of movements in the public's expectation of inflation and Ivrendi and Guloglu (2010) look at the relationships among monetary policy shocks, exchange rates and trade balances in inflation targeting countries, we investigate the relationships among market participants' expectations of future US monetary policy and asset prices and whether the relationships depend on the state of the economy. Our investigation is based on high frequency data (daily) rather than on lower frequency data (monthly or quarterly data) that are commonly used in macroeconomic and financial market analyses.…”
Section: Choice Of Variables In the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our investigation regarding the relationships between market participants' expectations of future monetary policy and asset prices employs a structural VAR (SVAR) model similar to those of Leduc et al (2007), Mehra and Herrington (2008) and Ivrendi and Guloglu (2010). While Leduc et al (2007) focus on the sources of high inflation in the 1970s, Mehra and Herrington (2008) deal with the sources of movements in the public's expectation of inflation and Ivrendi and Guloglu (2010) look at the relationships among monetary policy shocks, exchange rates and trade balances in inflation targeting countries, we investigate the relationships among market participants' expectations of future US monetary policy and asset prices and whether the relationships depend on the state of the economy.…”
Section: Choice Of Variables In the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%