2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.04.13.22273750
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mondo: Unifying diseases for the world, by the world

Abstract: There are thousands of distinct disease entities and concepts, each of which are known by different and sometimes contradictory names. The lack of a unified system for managing these entities poses a major challenge for both machines and humans that need to harmonize information to better predict causes and treatments for disease. The Mondo Disease Ontology is an open, community-driven ontology that integrates key medical and biomedical terminologies, supporting disease data integration to improve diagnosis, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the Bioregistry provides a solution for standardizing the syntax of references to and between various biomedical resources, it is not itself sufficient for standardizing equivalent entities occurring in different semantic spaces (e.g., Monarch Disease Ontology (MONDO) 54 , Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) 50 , Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) 55 , and Human Disease Ontology (DO) 56 for phenotypes and diseases; Cell Ontology (CL) 57 , Cell Line Ontology (CL) 58 , Brenda Tissue Ontology (BTO) 59 for cell types; GO, Reactome 60 , WikiPathways 61 for pathways) that often lead to redundancy when integrating disparate resources, such as when constructing knowledge graphs. However, the Bioregistry enables the standardization of the underlying CURIEs and URIs in these resources that makes existing solutions such as lexical mapping, graph-based entity alignment, and ontology merging more actionable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the Bioregistry provides a solution for standardizing the syntax of references to and between various biomedical resources, it is not itself sufficient for standardizing equivalent entities occurring in different semantic spaces (e.g., Monarch Disease Ontology (MONDO) 54 , Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) 50 , Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) 55 , and Human Disease Ontology (DO) 56 for phenotypes and diseases; Cell Ontology (CL) 57 , Cell Line Ontology (CL) 58 , Brenda Tissue Ontology (BTO) 59 for cell types; GO, Reactome 60 , WikiPathways 61 for pathways) that often lead to redundancy when integrating disparate resources, such as when constructing knowledge graphs. However, the Bioregistry enables the standardization of the underlying CURIEs and URIs in these resources that makes existing solutions such as lexical mapping, graph-based entity alignment, and ontology merging more actionable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The newly added data includes disease definitions, hierarchy, and mappings provided by the Mondo Disease Ontology (Mondo) ( 21 , 22 ). This includes synonyms for equivalent terms from 24 ontologies, such as Disease Ontology (DO) ( 23 ), Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) ( 24 ), Orphanet ( 25 ), Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) ( 26 ), Genetic and Rare Diseases Information Center (GARD) ( 21 ), etc.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ClinVar v20220403 database ( 38 ) was used. To select HCM-associated variants, we filtered the dataset using a combination of three disease ontologies by keeping variants with any of the following identifiers: MedGen ( 39 ) (C3495498, C0949658); OMIM ( 40 ) (192600); Mondo Disease Ontology ( 41 ) (0005045, 0024573). Additionally, we excluded all variants with zero-star review status, classified as “Uncertain_significance” or with conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%