2013
DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/104/17004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Momentum-resolved electronic structure at a buried interface from soft X-ray standing-wave angle-resolved photoemission

Abstract: -Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) is a powerful technique for the study of electronic structure, but it lacks a direct ability to study buried interfaces between two materials. We address this limitation by combining ARPES with soft x-ray standing-wave (SW) excitation (SWARPES), in which the SW profile is scanned through the depth of the sample. We have studied the buried interface in a prototypical magnetic tunnel junction La 0.7 Sr 0.3 MnO 3 /SrTiO 3 . Depth-and momentum-resolved maps of Mn … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
48
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
10
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This degree of agreement further confirms the accuracy of the resonant optical constants and the validity of the structure we are assuming for the sample. It also further demonstrates our previously established SW calculation methodology [32,33,35]. The RCs of Sr 3d and Gd 4f (as well as Gd 4d, not shown here) again strongly differ, with maxima and minima out of phase, a direct consequence of their origin from different layers of the sample.…”
Section: Sw Core-level Photoemission and Arpessupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This degree of agreement further confirms the accuracy of the resonant optical constants and the validity of the structure we are assuming for the sample. It also further demonstrates our previously established SW calculation methodology [32,33,35]. The RCs of Sr 3d and Gd 4f (as well as Gd 4d, not shown here) again strongly differ, with maxima and minima out of phase, a direct consequence of their origin from different layers of the sample.…”
Section: Sw Core-level Photoemission and Arpessupporting
confidence: 79%
“…or 19.8Å thick). The period of the multilayer is thus 35.5Å, which will also be the period of the SW perpendicular to the surface of the sample [32,33]. The STO and GTO layers were coherently and compressively strained to the underlying LSAT by about 1%.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently developed experimental techniques exist to probe buried LSMO/STO interfaces for the presence of the interfacespecific features predicted by our calculations to originate from the polar mismatch. 31,32 Furthermore, the band alignment between LSMO and STO can be continuously controlled by sub-unit-cell deposition of a SrMnO 3 layer, 33 which in our case allows a shift of the Fermi energy and thus control of the magnitude of the TAMR effect (Fig. 5).…”
Section: Outlook and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…As a future suggestion, the analysis of angle-resolved photoemission (ARPES) in NTR-HAXPES, should provide direct access to the depth-resolved interface band structure, as demonstrated recently in soft x-ray standing-wave ARPES 42 . …”
mentioning
confidence: 89%