Momentum: A smartphone application to support shared decision making for people using mental health services.

Abstract

The results indicate the relevance of using modern technology to support shared decision making (SDM) and the recovery model, though raise the question of how the actual use in the study is to be understood. The study thereby points to a need of further research into the understanding of the central consumer-provider relationship in SDM and in how decision aids are presented. (PsycINFO Database Record

Factors affecting implementation of digital health interventions for people with psychosis or bipolar disorder, and their family and friends: a systematic review

“…[28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] The only study published prior to 2007 involved a telehealth digital intervention. 45 Most of the studies used mixed methods, 28,29,31,32,34,35,[37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50] four used quantitative methods 30,33,36,51 and two studies used qualitative methodology. 52,53 The majority of the studies were feasibility and acceptability trials (42%), 29, 35, 36, 38, 40, 42-44, 50, 53 eight were designed to look specifically at implementation (31%), 28, 30, 32, 45-47, 49, 52 five were pilot studies (19%), 31,39,…”

“…45 Most of the studies used mixed methods, 28,29,31,32,34,35,[37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50] four used quantitative methods 30,33,36,51 and two studies used qualitative methodology. 52,53 The majority of the studies were feasibility and acceptability trials (42%), 29, 35, 36, 38, 40, 42-44, 50, 53 eight were designed to look specifically at implementation (31%), 28, 30, 32, 45-47, 49, 52 five were pilot studies (19%), 31,39,41,48,51 and two were RCTs (8%). 33,34 Seven of the studies included participants with schizophreniform disorders (27%), 29,30,37,38,43,44,51 seven those with bipolar disorder (27%), 28,33,36,40,41,…”

“…A key finding was the need for services to be able to adapt interventions so that they can work alongside or within existing infrastructures. 32,39 In a shared decision-making intervention, the individual had used an app prior to meeting with the clinician. However the lack of integration of this information from the app into the existing IT system meant that the clinician did not always know this in advance.…”

“…However the lack of integration of this information from the app into the existing IT system meant that the clinician did not always know this in advance. 39 This lack of interoperability was overcome in another study whereby prompts were incorporated into the existing electronic system to flag to staff which individuals were completing the intervention. 32 Lack of adaptability meant some users found information in psychoeducational interventions too complex, 47 whilst others felt the level was too simplistic and gave this as a reason for discontinuing.…”

Shared decision making in mental health care settings: Perspective, purpose and practice

“…First, although the outcome measures used by the majority of trial studies are fairly comprehensive in terms of covering clinical status, service satisfaction and intervention adherence, no studies have assessed the innovation and creativity of service users in problem solving, service users’ decision making, or service users’ insight into and understanding about their conditions. Second, we should not undermine the increasingly sophisticated capability of smartphones in the era of Web 3.0. It provides new options and groundbreaking social media interfaces that could support the application of SDM.…”