1987
DOI: 10.1007/bf01290659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moment of inertia in the interacting boson model

Abstract: Defining an intrinsic state for the interacting boson model (IBM) hamiltonian it is possible to obtain expression for the ground state moment of inertia J0 in terms of IBM hamiltonian parameters and the shape variables. Two such available approaches -one based on correspondence of the IBM hamiltonian with Bohr hamiltonian and the other one based on self-consistent cranking calculations with IBM states -are examined. Results of numerical calculations in both prescriptions are compared with microscopic cranking … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(19 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The numerical results of 2o and XQ for Sm and Gd isotopes are presented in Table 1 together with the sd IBM cranking results and the experimental values taken from Ref. [16]. It is seen that the sdg IBM values -both Xo and XQ -agree well with experimental values.…”
Section: J'o (23)supporting
confidence: 55%
“…The numerical results of 2o and XQ for Sm and Gd isotopes are presented in Table 1 together with the sd IBM cranking results and the experimental values taken from Ref. [16]. It is seen that the sdg IBM values -both Xo and XQ -agree well with experimental values.…”
Section: J'o (23)supporting
confidence: 55%
“…None of the works mentioned above had any success in obtaining agreement between theory and experiment. To this data, the best agreement has been attained in the work of Mishra and Mantri [14] using the interacting boson model (IBM). However, it is noticeable that excessive parametrization of the Hamiltonian of the IBM causes this result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…But, for "ordinary" nuclei, it is well known that there exists a discrepancy of the order of 10-40% between the theoretical BCS values and the experimental ones [7]. In order to reduce this discrepancy several works have been performed [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. However, these works deal with "ordinary" nuclei and do not include the n-p pairing correlations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%