2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.cretres.2009.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molluscan biostratigraphy and paleomagnetism of Campanian strata, Queen Charlotte Islands, British Columbia: implications for Pacific coast North America biochronology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The age range of marine strata within the Nanaimo Basin, representing arguably >90% of the succession, is well constrained biostratigraphically. Muller and Jeletzky (1970) established the modern biostratigraphic subdivisions of the Nanaimo Group sensu stricto based on ammonites and inoceramid bivalves, and this framework has been subsequently refined and improved (Ward, 1978;Haggart et al, 2005Haggart et al, , 2009Ward et al, 2012;Haggart and Graham, 2018). This modern biostratigraphic framework, supported by microfossil studies (McGugan, 1962), has demonstrated that the typical succession of the Nanaimo Group ranges in age from mid-Santonian to Maastrichtian.…”
Section: Biostratigraphic Age Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The age range of marine strata within the Nanaimo Basin, representing arguably >90% of the succession, is well constrained biostratigraphically. Muller and Jeletzky (1970) established the modern biostratigraphic subdivisions of the Nanaimo Group sensu stricto based on ammonites and inoceramid bivalves, and this framework has been subsequently refined and improved (Ward, 1978;Haggart et al, 2005Haggart et al, , 2009Ward et al, 2012;Haggart and Graham, 2018). This modern biostratigraphic framework, supported by microfossil studies (McGugan, 1962), has demonstrated that the typical succession of the Nanaimo Group ranges in age from mid-Santonian to Maastrichtian.…”
Section: Biostratigraphic Age Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Evidence for shallow formation include external laminae deflection, high minus-cement porosities, the protection of delicate shells and otherwise primary depositional features in concretions, the preservation of magnetic mineral orientations (Wynne et al 1995;Haggart et al 2009), the recovery of nodules in relatively shallow (, 600 meters below seafloor) drill cores, and limited-depth reconstructed burial histories for the host unit. Maximum burial depths have been quantified for the British (Hudson 1978) and Moeraki (Boles et al 1985) concretions examined here.…”
Section: High Concretion Body Temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haida Formation sediments grade upward into siltstone, mudstone, and shale, the upper part of which recently has been reassigned to the Bearskin Bay Formation (Dalby et al 2009). The Bearskin Bay Formation ranges from Albian to Cenomanian, but molluscan and foraminiferal taxa indicate a middle to late Albian age for the deposits from which the fernbearing concretion was recovered (Stritch and Schröder-Adams 1999;Dalby et al 2009;Haggart et al 2009). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%