2015
DOI: 10.1086/679352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesozoic Diversity of Osmundaceae: Osmundacaulis whittlesii sp. nov. in the Early Cretaceous of Western Canada

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to International Journal of Plant Sciences. Editor: Andrew KnollPremise of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…References: Bower (1926), Gould (1973), Herbst (2003, 2008, 2015), Kidston & Gwynne-Vaughan (1907), Miller (1971), Penhallow (1902a, 1902b), Schelpe (1955, 1956), Smith, Rothwell & Stockey (2015), Tidwell (1986, 1987, 1990, 2002), Tidwell & Jones (1987) and Tidwell & Pigg (1993).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…References: Bower (1926), Gould (1973), Herbst (2003, 2008, 2015), Kidston & Gwynne-Vaughan (1907), Miller (1971), Penhallow (1902a, 1902b), Schelpe (1955, 1956), Smith, Rothwell & Stockey (2015), Tidwell (1986, 1987, 1990, 2002), Tidwell & Jones (1987) and Tidwell & Pigg (1993).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precursors of this hypothesis were introduced before the advent of DNA based dating (Lovis, 1977;Rothwell, 1996;Smith, 1972), but were challenged by the rarity of Cretaceous fossils of Polypodiales (Collinson, 1996(Collinson, , 2001Skog, 2001). This pattern is unlikely to be explained by rock bias against the preservation of ferns because Jurassic and Cretaceous fossils are known for many other fern lineages such as Cyatheales, Gleicheniales, Osmundales, Salviniales, and Schizaeales (Hu & Taylor, 2014;Kvacek et al 2006;Mohr et al, 2015;Skog 2001;Smith et al, 2003;Smith et al, 2015;Tidwell and Ash, 1994;Vera and Herbst, 2015). As pointed out in studies on the spore record of ferns (Nagalingum et al, 2002), the microfossil record suggests a decline of ferns in the late Mesozoic instead of the Cretaceous to Eocene radiation suggested by DNA-based divergence time estimates (Schneider et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%