2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.05.085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecularly imprinted-solid phase extraction combined with simultaneous derivatization and dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction for selective extraction and preconcentration of methamphetamine and ecstasy from urine samples followed by gas chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 2 compare the proposed method with the other extraction methods for the determination of the target analytes in urine samples. The quantitative results of the proposed method are better than the molecularly imprinted-solid phase extraction with simultaneous derivatization and DLLME-GC-FID [35] without using derivatization method. The comparison of extraction time of the proposed method with solid-phase microextraction (SPME) [25] and microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) [36] for the extraction of the target analytes indicates that this novel method has a short extraction time of only one minute, which results in better quantitative results than the SPME and MAE methods.…”
Section: Analytical Methods Performancementioning
confidence: 78%
“…Table 2 compare the proposed method with the other extraction methods for the determination of the target analytes in urine samples. The quantitative results of the proposed method are better than the molecularly imprinted-solid phase extraction with simultaneous derivatization and DLLME-GC-FID [35] without using derivatization method. The comparison of extraction time of the proposed method with solid-phase microextraction (SPME) [25] and microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) [36] for the extraction of the target analytes indicates that this novel method has a short extraction time of only one minute, which results in better quantitative results than the SPME and MAE methods.…”
Section: Analytical Methods Performancementioning
confidence: 78%
“…In order to determine trace level of pesticide residues, an extraction and preconcentration step is necessary. Traditional liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) and solid phase extraction (SPE) are the most popular procedures in routine sample preparation because of their simplicity, efficiency, and wide acceptance in many standard methods [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. However, LLE technique is timeconsuming, requires large amounts of toxic organic solvents, and provides low enrichment of analytes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one single pretreatment technique often cannot meet the requirements of trace and ultra-trace analysis, especially in complicated matrices. Recently, multi-pretreatment techniques have been proposed based on MIPs and applied for biological and food samples, [429][430][431] such as MISPE-DLLME [432][433][434] and MI-MSPD-DLLME. 435 DLLME based on a ternary component solvent system has several advantages such as short extraction and equilibrium time, less organic solvent consumption, high recovery and an enhanced enrichment factor.…”
Section: 425mentioning
confidence: 99%