1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2860(98)00383-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular weights of polystyrenes in toluene solutions by light scattering. Comparison between classical values and values deduced from a new method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• to true values for molecular weight determination from Rayleigh light scattering and refraction in liquids. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• to true values for molecular weight determination from Rayleigh light scattering and refraction in liquids. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17] Accordingly, it is hardly surprising that the CZ method gives the lowest MAD and MD relative to supplier values (7.4 %, + 0.4 %), as opposed to a(gas) (9.3 %, + 3.0 %) and a(liq) (15 %, + 15 %) values. The M 2 [a(gas)] values are closer to M 2 (CZ) than the M 2 [a(liq)] values, and both are always higher than the CZ values.…”
Section: Molar Massmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…On the contrary, a(gas) and a(liq) equations lead to M 2 in better agreement with expected values (MADs less than 9 %) with no @1/@1 2 sign relation. This brings to the foreground the physical significance of Equations (18) and (19) with respect to Equation (17). In terms of MAD, a(gas) and a(liq) results only differ by 3 % on average; this emphasize the soundness of Equation (21).…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations