1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2860(98)00614-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular weights by light scattering in macromolecules solutions. Large deviations observed between a new method and the classical method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11,12,16,17,20 Studies have also been carried out with light scattering [21][22][23][24][25][26] and have concluded that MALLS (multiangle laser light scattering) can be used for the determination of the molecular weight and the molecular weight distribution of lignins. MALLS is an absolute molecular weight technique that is based on the intensity of the light that is scattered when a laser passes through a sample.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,12,16,17,20 Studies have also been carried out with light scattering [21][22][23][24][25][26] and have concluded that MALLS (multiangle laser light scattering) can be used for the determination of the molecular weight and the molecular weight distribution of lignins. MALLS is an absolute molecular weight technique that is based on the intensity of the light that is scattered when a laser passes through a sample.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• to true values for molecular weight determination from Rayleigh light scattering and refraction in liquids. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular weight values deduced by any formula should not be dependent on the solvent. When using different solvents, Beignon et al found that in some cases, M values calculated by the CZ formula were several times higher than in toluene. In fact, there is a flaw in the CZ formula: when the refractive index, n , of dilute solutions slightly depends on the addition of polymer, that formula leads to overestimated values of M (and even to infinite values if there is no dependence at all!…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13] These measurements provide weight-average molar mass M w and the socalled z-average square radius of gyration R 2 g D E z together with the second virial coefficient A 2 . Since 1996, Proutire and coworkers [14][15][16][17][18] have applied a new theory to dilute solutions to obtain M w and have explained several flaws in classical theory. These flaws are particularly enhanced for solutions with small refractive-index increments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, in many cases they are only assumed values deduced through the CZ equation for known M 2 values. [29] For these reasons and because the CZ equation is questionable, [14][15][16][17][18] the need for an experimental absolute Rayleigh ratio is a drawback of CZ equations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%