2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:stuc.0000010465.23794.d0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Structures of Acetylene Derivatives of Tin. VIII Trimethylstannylacetylene: Use of Results of Quantum-Chemical Calculations and Spectroscopic Measurements in Analysis of Gas-Phase Electron Diffraction Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen, the determined parameters of the nonrigid −CH 2 −CH 2 − fragment are different from those calculated at the MP2(full)/6−311G(3df,2p) level, whereas the parameters of the rigid part are in good agreement. The large differences between the rms vibrational amplitudes u h1 and those calculated in the traditional approximation u h0 (0.006 and 0.013 Å for the =C...C and C...O(f) terms, respectively) point also to the nonrigidity of the molecular fragment . The radial distribution curve f ( r ) shows also remarkable discrepancies between the experimental and theoretical curves in the ranges of the C−C, =C...C, C...O(n), and C...O(f) and other distances between the atoms involved in the large-amplitude ring-twisting motion (see Figure ; for definition of the C...O(f) and C...O(n) distances, see footnote b to Table ).…”
Section: Analysis Of the Ged Data Supplemented By Results Of Ab Initi...mentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As can be seen, the determined parameters of the nonrigid −CH 2 −CH 2 − fragment are different from those calculated at the MP2(full)/6−311G(3df,2p) level, whereas the parameters of the rigid part are in good agreement. The large differences between the rms vibrational amplitudes u h1 and those calculated in the traditional approximation u h0 (0.006 and 0.013 Å for the =C...C and C...O(f) terms, respectively) point also to the nonrigidity of the molecular fragment . The radial distribution curve f ( r ) shows also remarkable discrepancies between the experimental and theoretical curves in the ranges of the C−C, =C...C, C...O(n), and C...O(f) and other distances between the atoms involved in the large-amplitude ring-twisting motion (see Figure ; for definition of the C...O(f) and C...O(n) distances, see footnote b to Table ).…”
Section: Analysis Of the Ged Data Supplemented By Results Of Ab Initi...mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The large differences between the rms vibrational amplitudes u h1 and those calculated in the traditional approximation u h0 (0.006 and 0.013 Å for the )C...C and C...O(f) terms, respectively) point also to the nonrigidity of the molecular fragment. 35 The radial distribution curve f(r) shows also remarkable discrepancies between the experimental and theoretical curves in the ranges 3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Considerable progress has been made in the last decade toward the synthesis of primary α,β- and β,γ-unsaturated germanes and stannanes. , Some experimental gas-phase structures of organogermanes such as germane and halogenated germanes, ethynylgermane, methylgermane, ethylgermane, ethylchlorogermane, cyclopropylgermane, vinylgermane, (halomethyl)germane, , and propargylgermane and organostannanes such as stannane, trimethylstannylacetylene, , methylstannane bis(trimethylstannyl)acetylene, tetramethyltin, and tetraethynyltin 28 have been determined. The first structural studies of vinylstannane and allylstannane 29 will be published shortly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the next paper, Khaiikin et al [11] discussed trimethylstannylacetylene. How much conjugative stabilization arises from adjacent stannyl and alkyne moieties?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%