2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00044-017-1919-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular screening and analysis of novel therapeutic inhibitors against c-Jun N-terminal kinase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The greater the negative binding affinity, the stronger the ligand-receptor interaction and the better the prediction of molecular docking. [34] The results of the simulation showed the binding affinity for Hb with EtBr is À 7.9 kcal/mol, whereas, for GHb is À 8.5 kcal/mol, which shows a clear indication that EtBr is more strongly bound towards GHb, than Hb. This result is also evident by comparing figures 6a and 6c, where H bond donors are only LYS 99 and PRO 95 for Hb and LYS 99, ALA 130, TRP 37, PRO 95 for GHb.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The greater the negative binding affinity, the stronger the ligand-receptor interaction and the better the prediction of molecular docking. [34] The results of the simulation showed the binding affinity for Hb with EtBr is À 7.9 kcal/mol, whereas, for GHb is À 8.5 kcal/mol, which shows a clear indication that EtBr is more strongly bound towards GHb, than Hb. This result is also evident by comparing figures 6a and 6c, where H bond donors are only LYS 99 and PRO 95 for Hb and LYS 99, ALA 130, TRP 37, PRO 95 for GHb.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The strength of the ligand‐receptor interaction is decided by binding affinity. The greater the negative binding affinity, the stronger the ligand‐receptor interaction and the better the prediction of molecular docking [34] . The results of the simulation showed the binding affinity for Hb with EtBr is −7.9 kcal/mol, whereas, for GHb is −8.5 kcal/mol, which shows a clear indication that EtBr is more strongly bound towards GHb, than Hb.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This study was performed according to previously reported method [7]. Docking was started by IDO1 enzyme preparation and compound 1 and L-1MT optimization.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Binding affinity determines the strength of ligand-receptor interaction. The more negative binding affinity, the stronger ligand-receptor interaction and the better molecular docking prediction [7]. As shown in Table 1, the binding affinity values from the best pose (pose 1) of each ligand 1a, 1b, and 1c were -1.5, 0. binding affinity is also influenced by the energy of desolvation, conformation, interactions, and motions [19,20].…”
Section: Molecular Dockingmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation