2015
DOI: 10.1111/jeu.12211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Phylogeny of the Family Ophryscolecidae (Ciliophora, Litostomatea) Inferred from 18S rDNA Sequences

Abstract: The 18S rDNA was used to infer oral ciliature patterns of evolution within the family Ophryoscolecidae, with the addition of five new sequences of ciliates from the genus Ostracodinium. Our data confirmed the monophyly of the subfamilies Entodiniinae and Ophryoscolecinae, but more analysis would be required for the definition of the status of the subfamily Diplodiniinae. The oral infraciliature patterns reflect evolutionary divergence in the family Ophryscolecidae, observing monophyly on Entodinium-type, Diplo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our analyses suggest that other characters, such as the oral infraciliature, as proposed by Rossi et al. (), might be more relevant in the family Ophryoscolecidae.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our analyses suggest that other characters, such as the oral infraciliature, as proposed by Rossi et al. (), might be more relevant in the family Ophryoscolecidae.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…; Rossi et al. ). Although some phylogenetic analyses corroborate phylogenetic hypothesis based on morphological data (Wright and Lynn ,b; Wright et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are thirteen buccal infraciliature patterns with together M. medium-type in Ophryoscolecidae and phylogenetic relationships between six of them, Entodini um-type, Diplodinium-type, O. gracile-type, O. mam mosum-type, Epidinium-type, and Ophryoscolex-type were also confirmed with the molecular study (Rossi et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The first molecular phylogenies (Wright and Lynn, 1997a,b,c;Wright et al, 1997) corroborated the initial morphological studies placing trichostomatids as a monophyletic group within the Litostomatea. Starting from early 2000s and with the increasing availability of 18S rRNA gene sequences of members of the subclass Trichostomatia in public repositories (Cameron et al, 2001a(Cameron et al, , 2003Cameron and O'Donoghue, 2004b;Strüder-Kypke et al, 2007;Ito et al, 2010Ito et al, , 2014Pomajbíková et al, 2010Pomajbíková et al, , 2013Snelling et al, 2011;Chistyakova et al, 2014;Moon-Van der Staay et al, 2014;Grim et al, 2015;Rossi et al, 2015;Bardele et al, 2017;Cedrola et al, , 2019, the internal phylogenetic relationships within the subclass began to be elucidated. This caused a revolution in their systematics and revealed several taxonomic incongruences, mainly with respect to Entodiniomorphida and Vestibuliferida, for which the grouping based on morphological features does not seem to hold.…”
Section: Pastmentioning
confidence: 99%