2003
DOI: 10.3161/001.005.s101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Phylogenetics of the Chiropteran Family Vespertilionidae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

22
168
2
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(216 citation statements)
references
References 157 publications
22
168
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The result (Figure 1) shows that Murina and Myotisis have a close phylogenetic relationship and co-locate on a large clade; Eptesicus, Vespertilio, Hypsugo, Pipistrellus, and Nyctalus have a close phylogenetic relationship which co-locate on an another large clade. The above results are similar to the previous studies (Volleth and Heller 1994;Kawai et al 2002;Hoofer and Van Den Bussche 2003). Phylogenetic analysis shows that the Pipistrellini is multiline origin, Pipistrellus-like bats can be divided into three groups:…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…The result (Figure 1) shows that Murina and Myotisis have a close phylogenetic relationship and co-locate on a large clade; Eptesicus, Vespertilio, Hypsugo, Pipistrellus, and Nyctalus have a close phylogenetic relationship which co-locate on an another large clade. The above results are similar to the previous studies (Volleth and Heller 1994;Kawai et al 2002;Hoofer and Van Den Bussche 2003). Phylogenetic analysis shows that the Pipistrellini is multiline origin, Pipistrellus-like bats can be divided into three groups:…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…Instead, various species currently classified in distinct subgenera but living in the same biogeographic region grouped together in strongly supported clades. More recent work by Hoofer and Van Den Bussche (2003) and Stadelmann et al (2004) confirmed this surprising phylogenetic pattern, invalidating the classical, morphology-based systematic arrangement of this diverse group of bats. Unfortunately these molecular analyses were not informative about the Ethiopian species of Myotis as only M. welwitschii, M. bocagii and/or M. goudoti were sampled.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…We used the following palaeontological constraints obtained from the fossil record. The maximal age for the root of the Myotis radiation is given by its separation from the lineage leading to the Kerivoulinae and Murininae, both of which are currently considered as the closest outgroups to Myotis (Horá…ek et al, 2000;Jones et al, 2002;Hoofer and Van Den Bussche, 2003). According to Horá…ek (2001), this separation would date back to about 30 million years ago (MYA).…”
Section: Molecular Datingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por otra parte, la lista en Ceballos y Arroyo-Cabrales (2012) considera válida la familia de quirópteros Antrozoidae siguiendo a Simmons (1998). Sin embargo, evidencia más reciente (Hoofer y Van Den Bussche 2001, Hoofer y Van Den Bussche 2003, y Roehrs et al 2010 indica que se justifica considerarla una subfamilia dentro de Vespertilionidae (Antrozoinae); en la edición más reciente de Wilson y Reeder (2005) Simmons ya la recoloca como Antrozoinae. Por otra parte, Wilson y Reeder (2005) reconocen varias tribus dentro de la subfamilia Vespertilioninae, posición que aquí se sigue al mencionar aquellas a las que corresponden las especies presentes en Guanajuato (Eptesicini, Lasiurini, Nycticeiini, Pipistrellini y Plecotini).…”
unclassified