2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-1984.2005.00136.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular phylogenetic study of Hopea and Shorea (Dipterocarpaceae): Evidence from the trnL–trnF and internal transcribed spacer regions

Abstract: Hopea and Shorea are economically important timber tree genera distributed throughout South-East Asia. The taxonomic limits of these genera are problematic. Molecular phylogenies of Hopea and Shorea were inferred using two non-coding regions of chloroplast ( trn L -trn F) and nuclear ribosomal (internal transcribed spacer) DNA. The inferred phylogenetic relationships between Hopea and Shorea indicate that Shorea is paraphyletic and that Hopea is potentially monophyletic (particularly section Dryobalanoides ). … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
26
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
8
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interesting result in this study, H. dryobalanoides was grouped with S. johorensis and S. lepidota. Molecular analysis using trnL-trnF and ITS regions by Yulita et al (2005) observed that the molecular analysis has not been able to separate Shorea from Hopea into different monophyletic groups. Therefore, it is strongly suspected that the Hopea group has the same common ancestor with Shorea.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Tree Reconstruction Phylogenetic Analysis Of Rbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interesting result in this study, H. dryobalanoides was grouped with S. johorensis and S. lepidota. Molecular analysis using trnL-trnF and ITS regions by Yulita et al (2005) observed that the molecular analysis has not been able to separate Shorea from Hopea into different monophyletic groups. Therefore, it is strongly suspected that the Hopea group has the same common ancestor with Shorea.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Tree Reconstruction Phylogenetic Analysis Of Rbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phylogenetic analysis was carried out with the software PAUP* 4.0a146 (Swofford 2002) and MrBayes (Ronquist & Huelsenbeck 2003) using the maximum parsimony and Bayesian methods with Acorus calamus L. (Acoraceae) as outgroup, following Cabrera et al (2008); Cusimano et al (2011); Nauheimer et al (2012). The maximum parsimony trees were calculated based on chloroplast sequence data with gaps treated as missing data and heuristic search algorithms (Nei & Kumar 2000) with the following parameters: 1000 random addition sequence replicates, tree bisection reconnection (TBR) branch swapping, 10 parsimonious trees held after each replicate (Yulita et al 2005;Harrison & Langdale 2006). All characters were equally weighted and treated as unordered (Fitch 1971).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, chloroplast DNA analysis of Dipterocarpaceae showed the difficulty of distinguishing between closely related species in the genera level primarily to indicate the species of Shorea. In fact, several types in the same tribe have identical sequences [29].…”
Section: B Blast Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%