2006
DOI: 10.1086/504466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Outflows around High-Mass Young Stellar Objects

Abstract: We present a study of molecular outflows using high-resolution mapping of the CO (1-0) line emission toward eight relatively nearby 6.7 GHz methanol masers that are associated with massive star-forming regions. Outflows were detected in seven out of eight sources, and five of them clearly show bipolar or multiple outflow morphologies. These outflows have typical masses of a few solar masses, momenta of tens of M km s À1 , kinetic energies of $10 45 ergs, and mass entrainment rates of a few 10 À5 M yr À1 . They… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
26
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
5
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Small scale outflow found toward IRS 1: The parameters of the IRS 1 outflow are similar to the mean values of low-mass outflows (Wu et al 2004), and are about 2 orders of magnitude smaller than the parameters derived from surveys of high-mass outflows (Beuther et al 2002b;Wu et al 2005;Zhang et al 2005;Xu et al 2006). However, given that the surveys of high-mass molecular outflows are based on single-dish observations, picking up large-scale structure and considering thus larger areas of outflow emission, we compared the parameters of the IRS 1 outflow with other high-mass outflows observed with interferometers, listed in Table 4.…”
Section: The Young High-velocity Bipolar Outflow Toward Irsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Small scale outflow found toward IRS 1: The parameters of the IRS 1 outflow are similar to the mean values of low-mass outflows (Wu et al 2004), and are about 2 orders of magnitude smaller than the parameters derived from surveys of high-mass outflows (Beuther et al 2002b;Wu et al 2005;Zhang et al 2005;Xu et al 2006). However, given that the surveys of high-mass molecular outflows are based on single-dish observations, picking up large-scale structure and considering thus larger areas of outflow emission, we compared the parameters of the IRS 1 outflow with other high-mass outflows observed with interferometers, listed in Table 4.…”
Section: The Young High-velocity Bipolar Outflow Toward Irsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…One of the primary questions is that we do not yet have the resolving power to detect the accretion disk (with a scale of a few 1000 AU) directly with current instruments, and thus cannot answer where accretion occurs, in an isolated core (monolithic collapse) or in a protocluster environment (competitive accretion). In recent years, a lot of observational evidence showing collimated and energetic outflows in MSFRs (e.g., Beuther et al 2002;Xu et al 2006) indirectly infer the existence of an accretion disk under the assumption that the high-mass accretion disk drives these outflows via magnetocentrifugal acceleration. However, these outflow evidences still do not show whether accretion is from an isolated protostar or from a protocluster, as both monolithic collapse and competitive accretion will be accompanied by large-scale outflow.…”
Section: No 1 2010 Infall Evidence In Egos I 151mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The excitation temperature, T ex was assumed to be 30 K here for high-mass sources (Shepherd & Churchwell 1996a;Beuther et al 2002;Wu et al 2004;Xu et al 2006;Wu et al 2010). …”
Section: B Calculation Of Outflow Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the first CO outflow was discovered in Orion KL by Kwan & Scoville (1976), accumulated observations of high mass star formation regions show outflows are also common in massive star formation regions (e.g. Snell et al 1990;Shepherd & Churchwell 1996a;Ridge & Moore 2001;Beuther et al 2002;Wu et al 2004;Xu et al 2006;Arce et al 2007;de Villiers et al 2014;Maud et al 2015), indicating a similar driven mechanism. Despite the similarity, whether there are differences between low and high mass star formation region outflows (Beuther et al 2002;Wu et al 2004;Zinnecker & Yorke 2007) remain under debate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%