2011
DOI: 10.1021/jm200471r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Modeling: A Search for a Calpain Inhibitor as a New Treatment for Cataractogenesis

Abstract: Studies of 17 analoges of 3 (SJA6017) in an in silico calpain model are reconciled to measured IC50 values against ovine calpain. The studies validate the potential of the “model” and criteria established for inhibition as a tool to select structures for synthesis to test as calpain inhibitors. Using this screening methodology of virtual libraries led us to synthesize several inhibitors including macrocycle 33, which in vitro sheep eye lens culture experiments showed to substantially slow opacification.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(96 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[149] Binding site optimization has been shown to be particularly beneficial for GPCR homology models. [45,47,150,151] Homology models were used for docking into neuronal nicotinic receptor, [152] Trypanosoma brucei phosphodiesterases, [153] prostaglandin E synthase 1, [154] aryl hydrocarbon receptor transcription factor, [155] as well as VS against the following: the s1 receptor, [156] calpain, [157] kinases, [158][159][160][161] and GPCRs. [45,47,126,151,[162][163][164][165] Structural validation studies For us to have an expectation that a given docking setup (i.e., choice of program, scoring function, and approaches to deal with ligand and receptor flexibility) will deliver reliable results, it must be validated for a system under investigation (i.e., ligand and receptor type).…”
Section: Docking Into Homology Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[149] Binding site optimization has been shown to be particularly beneficial for GPCR homology models. [45,47,150,151] Homology models were used for docking into neuronal nicotinic receptor, [152] Trypanosoma brucei phosphodiesterases, [153] prostaglandin E synthase 1, [154] aryl hydrocarbon receptor transcription factor, [155] as well as VS against the following: the s1 receptor, [156] calpain, [157] kinases, [158][159][160][161] and GPCRs. [45,47,126,151,[162][163][164][165] Structural validation studies For us to have an expectation that a given docking setup (i.e., choice of program, scoring function, and approaches to deal with ligand and receptor flexibility) will deliver reliable results, it must be validated for a system under investigation (i.e., ligand and receptor type).…”
Section: Docking Into Homology Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Connolly's methods attempt to align points on surfaces by minimizing the angle between the surfaces of opposing molecules. Therefore, a rigid body approximation is still the standard for many protein-protein docking techniques [37][38][39][40][41]. The use of potential energy grids was established by Good ford, and various docking programs use such grid representations for energy calculations [42].…”
Section: Molecular Illustration Of Docking and Involve Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to protein preparation, the Ser115 residue of 1KXR was mutated to Cys115, so as to mimic the protein in physiological conditions; this was done using the standard mutation protocol of the Schrodinger software. 16,24 Chemical accuracy was ensured by addition of hydrogen atoms, correcting the bond orders and by neutralizing the side-chains which were neither close to the binding cavity nor were involved in the construction of salt bridges. The structure prepared underwent minimization by adopting the Protein Preparation Wizard with optimal potential to create the liquid simulation (OPLS)-2005 force field (FF) at an intermediate docking stage.…”
Section: ■ Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%