2018
DOI: 10.1111/jse.12453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular markers for phylogenetic applications derived from comparative plastome analysis of Prunus species

Abstract: Interspecific and intergeneric relationships of Prunus s.l. are still unclear due to low levels of genetic variation among species, and resulting partially unresolved phylogenetic inferences. Here we sequenced and compared six complete plastomes from two subgenera of Prunus in order to choose molecular markers to increase the amount of genetic variation suitable for inference of Prunus phylogeny. The plastomes range between 157 817 and 158 995 bp in length, and we found different levels of inverted repeat (IR)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cerasus , similar to the previous results (Kim et al. 2019 ), and P. apetala is sister to Prunus serrulata var. spontanea ( Figure 1 ).…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Cerasus , similar to the previous results (Kim et al. 2019 ), and P. apetala is sister to Prunus serrulata var. spontanea ( Figure 1 ).…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…In addition, the GC content in the IRs was higher than that in LSC and SSC, which is due to the presence of rRNA genes with high GC content (Kim and Lee, 2004). The conserved genome size, GC content, and gene number of Maddenia plastomes resemble other Amygdaloideae species (Wang et al, 2013;Kim et al, 2018). Although gene rearrangement events have been reported in some genera of other families, such as Lasthenia of Asteraceae (Walker et al, 2014), Anemone of Ranunculaceae (Liu et al, 2018), and Passiflora of Passifloraceae (Rabah et al, 2018), we observed no such events in Maddenia plastomes (Supplementary Figure 1).…”
Section: Discussion Comparative Plastomes Of Maddeniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once sequenced, the complete plastome sequence can be screened for potential taxon-specific, hyper-variable gene regions that are likely to be a more cost-effective, yet useful, species identification tool, than the entire plastome [15,26]. Although this strategy has worked for a number of gene regions across a range of taxa (i.e., the ycf1 gene region within Pterocarpus [27] and Prunus [28]; the trnC-rps16, trnS-trnG, and trnE-trnM gene regions for Panax [22]; and trnQ-psbK, trnR-atpA, trnS-psbZ and rpl33-rps18 for Oresitrophe [26]) to date, there are no reported sequences for the plastomes of any Calligonum species, nor has a genome-wide search for taxon-specific barcodes been completed for the group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%