2021
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.743643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Species Delimitation of the Maddenia Group of Prunus (Rosaceae): Evidence From Plastome and Nuclear Sequences and Morphology

Abstract: The recognition, identification, and differentiation of closely related plant species present significant and notorious challenges to taxonomists. The Maddenia group of Prunus, which comprises four to seven species, is an example of a group in which species delimitation and phylogenetic reconstruction have been difficult, due to the lack of clear morphological distinctions, limited sampling, and low informativeness of molecular evidence. Thus, the precise number of species in the group and the relationships am… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
12
2
Order By: Relevance
“…With next-generation DNA sequencing (NGS) technologies, genome-wide sequence variation has begun to replace one or a few sequence loci for the identification and delimitation of plant species ( Li et al, 2015 ; Coissac et al, 2016 ; Hollingsworth et al, 2016 ). The genome skimming approach, which uses NGS technologies to generate multi-copy and highly repetitive genome components, such as whole plastid genomes (plastomes) and nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrDNA) clusters via relatively low coverage genome sequencing ( Straub et al, 2012 ), has been increasingly used for species identification and delimitation in recent years ( Nock et al, 2011 ; Kane et al, 2012 ; Dodsworth, 2015 ; Li et al, 2015 ; Ruhsam et al, 2015 ; Firetti et al, 2017 ; Fu et al, 2019 , 2021 ; Ji et al, 2019a , 2020 , 2021 ; Knope et al, 2020 ; Ślipiko et al, 2020 ; Su et al, 2021 ). Compared with restriction-site associated DNA sequencing (RAD-seq; Miller et al, 2007 ; Baird et al, 2008 ), another NSG-based technique that is extensively used to generate genomic data for plant species identification and delimitation (e.g., Wu et al, 2018 ; Donkpegan et al, 2020 ; Ma et al, 2020 ; Zhou et al, 2020 ; Li et al, 2021 ), the promising advantage of using genome skimming for species identification and delimitation is the avoidance of problems encountered with RAD-seq ( Kane et al, 2012 ; Hollingsworth et al, 2016 ), such as only applying to diploids and generating asymmetric data between distinctly related taxa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With next-generation DNA sequencing (NGS) technologies, genome-wide sequence variation has begun to replace one or a few sequence loci for the identification and delimitation of plant species ( Li et al, 2015 ; Coissac et al, 2016 ; Hollingsworth et al, 2016 ). The genome skimming approach, which uses NGS technologies to generate multi-copy and highly repetitive genome components, such as whole plastid genomes (plastomes) and nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrDNA) clusters via relatively low coverage genome sequencing ( Straub et al, 2012 ), has been increasingly used for species identification and delimitation in recent years ( Nock et al, 2011 ; Kane et al, 2012 ; Dodsworth, 2015 ; Li et al, 2015 ; Ruhsam et al, 2015 ; Firetti et al, 2017 ; Fu et al, 2019 , 2021 ; Ji et al, 2019a , 2020 , 2021 ; Knope et al, 2020 ; Ślipiko et al, 2020 ; Su et al, 2021 ). Compared with restriction-site associated DNA sequencing (RAD-seq; Miller et al, 2007 ; Baird et al, 2008 ), another NSG-based technique that is extensively used to generate genomic data for plant species identification and delimitation (e.g., Wu et al, 2018 ; Donkpegan et al, 2020 ; Ma et al, 2020 ; Zhou et al, 2020 ; Li et al, 2021 ), the promising advantage of using genome skimming for species identification and delimitation is the avoidance of problems encountered with RAD-seq ( Kane et al, 2012 ; Hollingsworth et al, 2016 ), such as only applying to diploids and generating asymmetric data between distinctly related taxa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2021 ; NC059022, NC059023, NC059024, NC059025, NC059026, NC059027, Su et al. 2021 ; NC053881, Wang et al. 2021 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2020 ; Su et al. 2021 ) However, genomic resources of Laurocerasus species are extremely scarce (Zou et al. 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combinations of plastid and biparentally inherited nuclear markers, however, often reveal conflicting phylogenetic signals as a first indicator of reticulate relationships. Analyses of single copy-nuclear gene sequences and plastomes can be useful (e.g., in Maddenia [193]).…”
Section: Recognition Of Existing Lineages: Methodical Advances In The...mentioning
confidence: 99%