2005
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2004.0581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Marker Diversity and Field Performance in Commercial Cotton Cultivars Evaluated in the Southwestern USA

Abstract: Gutierrez et al., 2002; Lu and Myers, 2002). Genetic distances could be as low as 1 to 3%. Research in Austra-Genetic diversity in modern upland cotton cultivars (Gossypium lia, China, and Pakistan obtained similar results (Multani hirsutum L.) is thought to be narrow, thus limiting genetic advance. Robust information on the genetic relatedness among currently grown and Lyon, 1995; Zuo et al., 2000;Rahman et al., 2002). cotton cultivars is lacking. The objectives of the present study were The hypothesized narr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
51
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(45 reference statements)
7
51
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there may be exceptions, there was high similarity between most of the genotypes tested, agreeing L. F. Araújo et al with other work already done on strains of upland cotton (BERTINI et al, 2006;MENEZES et al, 2008;RAHMAN et al, 2002;ULLAH, I. et al 2012;ZHANG et al, 2005). According to McCarty et al, (2007), breeding programs for cotton present a narrowing of the genetic base, which requires detailed genealogical studies into the parent plants used in these programs in order to avoid related crossings.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Although there may be exceptions, there was high similarity between most of the genotypes tested, agreeing L. F. Araújo et al with other work already done on strains of upland cotton (BERTINI et al, 2006;MENEZES et al, 2008;RAHMAN et al, 2002;ULLAH, I. et al 2012;ZHANG et al, 2005). According to McCarty et al, (2007), breeding programs for cotton present a narrowing of the genetic base, which requires detailed genealogical studies into the parent plants used in these programs in order to avoid related crossings.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…DNA molecular markers were the most effective method of genetic analysis at the DNA level. In cotton, various molecular markers have been applied in genetic diversity analysis such as simple sequence repeats (SSRs), rapid amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD), amplified fragment length polymorphism, inter-SSR, and sequence-related amplified polymorphism; the cotton species included Gossypium hirsutum (Xu et al, 2001;Rana et al, 2005;Zhang et al, 2005;Wu et al, 2010;Kalivas et al, 2011), G. barbadense (Westengen et al, 2005;El-Zanaty et al, 2011;Wang et al, 2011), and G. arboretum (Liu et al, 2006;Kantartzi et al, 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon has been demonstrated in multiple investigations (Liu et al 2000;Gutierrez et al 2002;Lacape et al 2007;Rahman et al 2002b). Second, limited use of wild cotton species for breeding new cultivars is another major reason for the narrow genetic base, a major cause of stagnation in cotton productivity worldwide (Rahman et al 2002a;Zhang et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%