2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11095-014-1527-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Indicators of Surface and Bulk Instability of Hot Melt Extruded Amorphous Solid Dispersions

Abstract: The stability of the amorphous drug-rich domains appears to be governed by the physical stabilities of the amorphous drugs. The more commonly used indicators such as Tg, fragility of the amorphous drug and the theoretically predicted drug-polymer solubility showed less influence on the bulk and surface stabilities of the extrudates in comparison to the molecular mobility of the amorphous drug.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thermal analysis has been used as a valuable tool to predict drug-polymer miscibility 19,[32][33][34] .…”
Section: Flory Huggins (F-h) Theory For the Prediction Of Drug/polymementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermal analysis has been used as a valuable tool to predict drug-polymer miscibility 19,[32][33][34] .…”
Section: Flory Huggins (F-h) Theory For the Prediction Of Drug/polymementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having a high number of coated pellets also reduces the risk for dose-dumping 3,4 . Furthermore, the surface of amorphous solid dispersion formulations has also been shown to be more vulnerable to crystallization of the amorphous drug phase 5 , hence an additional coating layer could potentially stabilize these formulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Controlling the release of glass solutions also allows for a decreased dosing scheme, a better patient compliance and a reduced risk of side effects 6 . It could, however, be 5 argued that poorly soluble drugs already inherently possess a slow release dissolution profile, but this is compound specific, and non-adjustable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O primeiro está relacionado à temperatura do processo, que deve ser monitorado para que não ocorra a degradação do fármaco, enquanto que o outro, relaciona-se com quantidade de ativo carreada pelo polímero, que se for muito elevada pode comprometer a estabilidade da formulação, mais precisamente, a sua dissolução (ALMEIDA et al, 2012;GRYCZE, 2012;YANG et al, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…No caso das formulações com 30% de carga, o pico do SCM se manteve, porém, de modo menos pronunciado, levando à suposição de que parte do material, ainda no estado cristalino se encontra disperso no polímero (ALMEIDA et al, 2012;GRYCZE, 2012;YANG et al, 2015). De acordo com estes resultados, optou-se por utilizar as mesmas condições no DOE, de modo a avaliar a influência da carga de fármaco, temperatura e tamanho do grânulo na dissolução do SCM.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified