2006
DOI: 10.1007/bf03206653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular genetics of addiction vulnerability

Abstract: Summary:Classical genetic studies document strong complex genetic contributions to abuse of multiple addictive substances, to mnemonic processes that are likely to include those involved in substance dependence, and to the volumes of brain gray matter in regions that are likely to contribute to mnemonic/ cognitive and to addictive processes. The working idea that these three heritable phenotypes are likely to share some of the same complex genetic underpinnings is presented. This review contains association-ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have focused on the 30 genes for which the differences between dependent and control individuals enhance the convergence of results previously obtained from four other abuser vs control whole genome association studies. The identification of allelic associations within so many genes that encode cell adhesion and extracellular matrix molecules support important roles for neuronal connectivities and memory-like functions in individual differences in vulnerabilities to addictions [32]. Data for each of these 30 genes provides new information about vulnerability to nicotine dependence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have focused on the 30 genes for which the differences between dependent and control individuals enhance the convergence of results previously obtained from four other abuser vs control whole genome association studies. The identification of allelic associations within so many genes that encode cell adhesion and extracellular matrix molecules support important roles for neuronal connectivities and memory-like functions in individual differences in vulnerabilities to addictions [32]. Data for each of these 30 genes provides new information about vulnerability to nicotine dependence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classes of genes identified and convergence with results from other GWA studies point toward substantial roles for individual differences in mnemonic, as well as rewarding, brain systems and individual differences in vulnerability to methamphetamine dependence. 20 The reliability and validity of the current approach are supported by many lines of evidence. These include data for clinical assessments made by multiple observers, the reliability and validity of the microarray-based genotyping approaches used herein, 32,52,57,62 the extent to which the markers that displayed nominally positive differences between abusers and controls clustered together in specific chromosomal regions, the extent to which observations made in these 2 samples converge with each other, and the extent to which these results converge with those from other studies that compare dependent vs control individuals.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The identification of this and other genes whose variants are good candidates to contribute to mnemonic aspects of addiction support the view that substantial components of the individual difference in vulnerability to dependence on addictive substances relate to individual differences in mnemonic systems. 20 The convergence between the genes identified by these samples and by genes identified in previous GWA studies for dependence on other legal and illegal addictive substances supports roles for allelic variants that are well represented in chromosomes from African, European, and Asian racial/ethnic groups. 32,57 Genes identified by these methamphetamine-dependence studies, but not as strongly by any of these other GWA comparisons, are also of interest.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A genetic architecture with modest individual contributions from variants at a number of loci that are likely to exert influences in each addicted individual supports use of association based approaches. Genome wide association (see below) seems to be the best way to aid in defining which reported linkage results are more or less likely to be "real", eg to represent reproducible observations (reviewed in [61][62][63][64][65][66][67])…”
Section: A Linkage Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%