No abstract

Two well-characterized cannabinoid receptors (CBrs), CB1 and CB2, mediate the effects of cannabinoids and marijuana use, with functional evidence for other CBrs. CB1 receptors are expressed primarily in brain and peripheral tissues. For over a decade several laboratories were unable to detect CB2 receptors in brain and were known to be intensely expressed in peripheral and immune tissues and have traditionally been referred to as peripheral CB2 CBrs. We have reported the discovery and functional presence of CB2 cannabinoid receptors in mammalian brain that may be involved in depression and drug abuse and this was supported by reports of identification of neuronal CB2 receptors that are involved in emesis. We used RT-PCR, immunoblotting, hippocampal cultures, immunohistochemistry, transmission electron microscopy, and stereotaxic techniques with behavioral assays to determine the functional expression of CB2 CBrs in rat brain and mice brain exposed to chronic mild stress (CMS) or those treated with abused drugs. RT-PCR analyses supported the expression of brain CB2 receptor transcripts at levels much lower than those of CB1 receptors. In situ hybridization revealed CB2 mRNA in cerebellar neurons of wild-type but not of CB2 knockout mice. Abundant CB2 receptor immunoreactivity (iCB2) in neuronal and glial processes was detected in brain and CB2 expression was detected in neuron-specific enolase (NSE) positive hippocampal cell cultures. The effect of direct CB2 antisense oligonucleotide injection into the brain and treatment with JWH015 in motor function and plus-maze tests also demonstrated the functional presence of CB2 cannabinoid receptors in the central nervous system (CNS). Thus, contrary to the prevailing view that CB2 CBrs are restricted to peripheral tissues and predominantly in immune cells, we demonstrated that CB2 CBrs and their gene transcripts are widely distributed in the brain. This multifocal expression of CB2 immunoreactivity in brain suggests that CB2 receptors may play broader roles in the brain than previously anticipated and may be exploited as new targets in the treatment of depression and substance abuse.

The presence and function of cannabinoid CB2 receptors in the brain have been subject to debate. We report here that systemic, intranasal or intra-accumbens local administration of JWH133, a selective CB2 receptor agonist, dose-dependently inhibits intravenous cocaine self-administration, cocaine-enhanced locomotion, and cocaine-enhanced accumbens dopamine (DA) in wild-type (WT) and CB1 receptor-knockout (CB1−/−), but not CB2−/−, mice. This inhibition is mimicked by GW405833, another CB2 receptor agonist with a different chemical structure, and is blocked by AM630, a selective CB2 receptor antagonist. Intra-accumbens JWH133 alone dose-dependently decreases, while intra-accumbens AM630 elevates, extracellular DA and locomotion in WT and CB1−/− mice, but not in CB2−/− mice. Intra-accumbens AM630 also blocks the reduction in cocaine self-administration and extracellular DA produced by systemic administration of JWH133. These findings, for the first time, suggest that brain CB2 receptors modulate cocaine’s rewarding and locomotor-stimulating effects, likely by a DA-dependent mechanism.

Cannabinoid CB 2 receptors (CB 2 Rs) have been recently reported to modulate brain dopamine (DA)-related behaviors; however, the cellular mechanisms underlying these actions are unclear. Here we report that CB 2 Rs are expressed in ventral tegmental area (VTA) DA neurons and functionally modulate DA neuronal excitability and DA-related behavior. In situ hybridization and immunohistochemical assays detected CB 2 mRNA and CB 2 R immunostaining in VTA DA neurons. Electrophysiological studies demonstrated that activation of CB 2 Rs by JWH133 or other CB 2 R agonists inhibited VTA DA neuronal firing in vivo and ex vivo, whereas microinjections of JWH133 into the VTA inhibited cocaine self-administration. Importantly, all of the above findings observed in WT or CB 1 −/− mice are blocked by CB 2 R antagonist and absent in CB 2 −/− mice. These data suggest that CB 2 R-mediated reduction of VTA DA neuronal activity may underlie JWH133's modulation of DA-regulated behaviors.T he presence of functional cannabinoid CB 2 receptors (CB 2 Rs) in the brain has been controversial. When CB 2 Rs were first cloned, in situ hybridization (ISH) failed to detect CB 2 mRNA in brain (1). Similarly, Northern blot and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays failed to detect CB 2 mRNA in brain (2-5). Therefore, CB 2 Rs were considered "peripheral cannabinoid receptors" (1, 6).In contrast, other studies using ISH and radioligand binding assays detected CB 2 mRNA and receptor binding in rat retina (7), mouse cerebral cortex (8), and hippocampus and striatum of nonhuman primates (9). More recent studies using RT-PCR also detected CB 2 mRNA in the cortex, striatum, hippocampus, amygdala, and brainstem (9-14). Immunoblot and immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays detected CB 2 R immunoreactivity or immunostaining in various brain regions (13,(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). The specificities of the detected CB 2 R protein and CB 2 -mRNA remain questionable, however, owing to a lack of controls using CB 1 −/− and CB 2 −/− mice in most previous studies (21). A currently accepted view is that brain CB 2 Rs are expressed predominantly in activated microglia during neuroinflammation, whereas brain neurons, except for a very small number in the brainstem, lack CB 2 R expression (21).On the other hand, we recently reported that brain CB 2 Rs modulate cocaine self-administration and cocaine-induced increases in locomotion and extracellular dopamine (DA) in the nucleus accumbens in mice (22). This finding is supported by recent studies demonstrating that systemic administration of the CB 2 R agonist O-1966 inhibited cocaine-induced conditioned place preference in WT mice, but not in CB 2 −/− mice (23), and that increased CB 2 R expression in mouse brain attenuates cocaine self-administration and cocaine-enhanced locomotion (19). In addition, brain CB 2 Rs may be involved in several DA-related CNS disorders, such as Parkinson's disease (24), schizophrenia (25), anxiety (26), and depression (27). The cellular mechanisms underlying CB 2 R modulation of DA-related behav...

SUMMARY Microglia play critical roles in tissue homeostasis and can also modulate neuronal function and synaptic connectivity. In contrast to astrocytes and oligodendrocytes, which arise from multiple progenitor pools, microglia arise from yolk sac progenitors and are widely considered to be equivalent throughout the CNS. However, little is known about basic properties of deep brain microglia, such as those within the basal ganglia (BG). Here, we show that microglial anatomical features, lysosome content, membrane properties, and transcriptomes differ significantly across BG nuclei. Region-specific phenotypes of BG microglia emerged during the second postnatal week and were re-established following genetic or pharmacological microglial ablation and repopulation in the adult, indicating that local cues play an ongoing role in shaping microglial diversity. These findings demonstrate that microglia in the healthy brain exhibit a spectrum of distinct functional states and provide a critical foundation for defining microglial contributions to BG circuit function.

No abstract

Environmental enrichment (EE) increases dentate gyrus (DG) neurogenesis and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels. However, running is considered an element of EE. To dissociate effects of physical activity and enrichment on hippocampal neurogenesis and BDNF levels, young female C57Bl/6 mice were housed under control, running, enrichment, or enrichment plus running conditions, and injected with bromodeoxyuridine. Cell genesis was assessed after 12 d and differentiation was analyzed 1 mo later. In addition, locomotor activity in the open field and hippocampal mature BDNF peptide levels were measured. Open-field adaptation was improved in all groups, compared to controls, but more so with running. New cell proliferation, survival, neuron number, and neurotrophin levels were enhanced only when running was accessible. We conclude that exercise is the critical factor mediating increased BDNF levels and adult hippocampal neurogenesis.[Supplemental material is available for this article.]Exposure to environmental enrichment (EE) has positive effects on brain function, including increased numbers of dendritic branches and spines, enlargement of synapses, and improved cognition (Bennett et al. 1964;Rosenzweig and Bennett 1996). More recently, it was discovered that EE enhances the survival of newly born neurons in the dentate gyrus (DG) of the hippocampus (Kempermann et al. 1997) and increases brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels (Falkenberg et al. 1992;Rossi et al. 2006;Sun et al. 2010). EE has many aspects, including increased opportunity for learning, socialization, and physical activity. Among these, exercise was found to enhance neurogenesis (van Praag et al. 1999). Subsequently, physical activity and enrichment have been regarded as equivalent neurogenic stimuli, albeit with different underlying mechanisms. Exercise is considered to mainly enhance cell proliferation, whereas enrichment is deemed to increase new cell survival (Olson et al. 2006;Kempermann et al. 2010). However, in many studies the enriched environment includes physical activity (Kempermann et al. 1997(Kempermann et al. , 1998van Praag et al. 1999;Rossi et al. 2006;Schloesser et al. 2010;Sun et al. 2010), making it difficult to assess the unique contributions of EE and exercise to adult neurogenesis, neurotrophin levels, and behavior.The current study aims to directly differentiate between the effects of enriched environment only (EEO), physical activity (RUN), and the combination of enrichment and running (EER). Here we show that running is the critical factor in stimulating adult hippocampal neurogenesis and enhancing mature BDNF peptide levels. Moreover, enrichment in the absence of running does not increase adult hippocampal neurogenesis or BDNF levels in the hippocampus. Open-field adaptation was improved in all groups as compared to controls, but more so in the groups that included running. These findings suggest that enrichment and exercise are distinct functional interventions.Forty female C57B1/6 mice (5 wk old) were div...

Strong genetic contributions to drug abuse vulnerability are well documented, but few chromosomal locations for human drug-abuse vulnerability alleles have been confirmed. We now identify chromosomal markers whose alleles distinguish drug abusers from control individuals in each of two samples, on the basis of pooled-sample microarray and association analyses. Reproducibly positive chromosomal regions defined by these markers in conjunction with previous results were especially unlikely to have been identified by chance. Positive markers identify the alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) locus, flank the brain-derived neurotropic factor (BDNF) locus, and mark seven other regions previously linked to vulnerability to nicotine or alcohol abuse. These data support polygenic contributions of common allelic variants to polysubstance abuse vulnerability.