2021
DOI: 10.1080/01647954.2021.1990406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular genetic analysis of resistance-associated mutations in the experimental lines of spider miteTetranychus urticaeKoch, selected for resistance to bifenthrin and abamectin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To examine whether the difference in susceptibility to bifenthrin could be explained by target-site resistance mutations, we screened for known mutations in the VGSC and found that three out of four bifenthrin-resistant strains carried the L1024V mutation in the VGSC (MR-VL, MR-VLi and ES1). Next to the L1024V mutation, the most resistant strain in this study, ES1, also showed the presence of the F1538I mutation, which has been frequently associated with pyrethroid resistance [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 30 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 ]. We did find the F1538I mutation in the VGSC of the susceptible strain UK4, but it was at a low frequency and therefore probably did not result in resistance in our bioassays.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…To examine whether the difference in susceptibility to bifenthrin could be explained by target-site resistance mutations, we screened for known mutations in the VGSC and found that three out of four bifenthrin-resistant strains carried the L1024V mutation in the VGSC (MR-VL, MR-VLi and ES1). Next to the L1024V mutation, the most resistant strain in this study, ES1, also showed the presence of the F1538I mutation, which has been frequently associated with pyrethroid resistance [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 30 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 ]. We did find the F1538I mutation in the VGSC of the susceptible strain UK4, but it was at a low frequency and therefore probably did not result in resistance in our bioassays.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%